Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,262 Results

GREENTECH MEGA FOOD PARK PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | May 28, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner submitted FORM GST TRAN-1 on 23.12.2017 within the time prescribed. However, it was noticed that due to some inadvertent mistake, the amount of CENVAT credit admissible as ITC was not filled up in the column due to which, the said credit is not being reflected in the electronic credit ledger. In the above circumstance, petitioner tried to submit the revised declaration form in GST TRAN-1. The petitioner for the above purpose, moved an application dated 13.02.2...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

P.V. RAMANA REDDY vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Supreme Court | May 27, 2019)

ORDER SLP(Crl.) No. 4430/2019 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and upon perusing the relevant material, we are not inclined to interfere. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. Diary No. 15477/2019, SLP(Crl.) Nos. 4322- 4324/2019, SLP(Crl.) No. 4571/2019 and SLP(Crl.) No. 4546/2019 List the matters on 29.5.2019. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. MCNALLY BHARAT ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | May 27, 2019)

ORDER (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s. McNally Bharat Engineering Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The brief facts of the case are that under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, an application was filed by the Applicant No. 1 against the Respondent before the Delhi State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering. The above Applicant had alleged that the Respondent had illegally charged ₹ 10,61 460/- as GST on 90% of the basic sale price and ₹ 44,227/- as Service Tax on 10% of the basic sale price on the sale of a built up house located in “Eldeco ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. This Report dated 27.02.2019, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that complaint dated 26.09.2018 was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, by the Applicant No. 1, alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purchase of a flat in the Respondent's project “Habitat-78”...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

COLO COLOR (PROP. HIRAL PINKAL RAMBHIA)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 24, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Colo Color (Prop. Hiral Pinkal Rambhia), seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. 1...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SECURITY AND INTELLIEGENCE SERVICES (INDIA) LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 24, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE SERVICES (INDIA) LTD, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. NIKHIL COMFORTS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 24, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/s. NIKHIL COMFORTS, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. The transaction would b...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KONKAN LNG PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 24, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Konkan LNG Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. 1. Whether o...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


20
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).