Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER PER 1. Although we had placed the respondents on notice and had also required them to file a reply, no counter affidavit has been filed till date. Bearing in mind the disclosures which are made, we find that there would be no justification to continue the writ petition on our board in light of the facts which are noticed hereinafter. 2. The petitioner is essentially aggrieved by the orders dated 29 December 2022 and 20 February 2024, which have been affirmed by the Appellate Aut...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER By consent of both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 29.08.2024 relating to the assessment year 2019-2020. 3. The petitioner is a partnership concern engaged in the business of hotels, boarding and lodging and registered under the GST Act. During the relevant period of 2019-20, the petitioner has filed the returns and paid appropriate taxes. Whi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MARANG BURU TRUST vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & OTHERS


(Jharkhand High Court | Nov 18, 2024)

ORDER Per Deepak Roshan, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred for following reliefs; (i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction setting aside entire proceeding of cancellation of the GST registration arising of out of the order dated 16.11.2022 in view of the show cause notice dated 07.10.2022 whereby Respondent No.3 has suspended the GST registration on 07.10.2022 on the same day of show cause notice followe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT: (Per M. S. Sonak, J.) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Leave is granted to amend the Petition and challenge the remarks/order on pages 95 to 97, annexed to the Respondents’ reply—amendment to be carried out immediately. 3. Rule. The Rule is made returnable immediately at the request of and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 4. Typically, we would have relegated the Petitioner to avail of the alternate remedies in such...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated September 12, 2024 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, State Goods & Services Tax, Sector 17, Kanpur/respondent No.3 under Section 74 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred as 'the Act') for the financial year 2021-22. 3. Fact...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL Sri Karan Talwar, Learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.P.Kashyap, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Sri B. Mukherjee, learned counsel representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.5. 2. With the consent finally heard. 3. This petition challenges the appellate order dated 19.07.2024 whereby, the appeal of the petitioner was dismissed,...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court, being aggrieved by the fact that petitioner has been denied the benefit of input tax credit on account of the provisions contained in Sub Section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts, for the financial year 2018-19, through Ext.P1 order dated 12.02.2024. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that, with the notification of Sub-Section (5) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts, the petitioner would now be entitled to...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 01.03.2024 passed by the respondent relating to the assessment year 2021-2022. 2. Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main Writ Petition is taken for disposal at the admission stage. 3. The petitioner is a dealer in Electrical and Electronic items and registered under Goods and Services Act, 2017. During the rele...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LOUIS MATHEW ANTONY vs. STATE TAX OFFICER & OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | Nov 15, 2024)

JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court, being aggrieved by the fact that petitioner has been denied the benefit of input tax credit on account of the provisions contained in Sub Section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts, for the financial years 2018-19 and 2019-20, through Exts.P1 and P2 orders dated 13.02.2024 and 23.05.2024 respectively. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that, with the notification of Sub-Section (5) of Section 16 of the CGST/...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court, being aggrieved by the fact that petitioner has been denied the benefit of input tax credit on account of the provisions contained in Sub Section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts, for the financial year 2019-20, through Ext.P3 order dated 23.08.2024. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that, with the notification of Sub-Section (5) of Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts, the petitioner would now be entitled to...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)