^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

S.K. AGE EXPORTS vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
(Bombay High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

B.P. COLABAWALLA
FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA

Pet. Counsel

Roshil Nichani

Aansh Desai

Pythagoras Legal

Res. Counsel

Jyoti Chavan

Himanshu Takke

Ramesh Shendage

Petitioner / Applicant	S.K. AGE EXPORTS
Respondent	STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
Court	Bombay High Court
State	Maharashtra
Date	Jan 31, 2025
Order No.	WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2159 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 3013 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2159 OF 2025
Citation	2025(1) TAXREPLY 12391
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
P.C. 1. Interim Application No. 3013 of 2025 is not on board. With the consent of parties taken on board. 2. The above Writ Petition has been filed inter-alia seeking to hold and declare that the actions of Respondent No. 3 in seeking to recover a sum of Rs. 52,39,98,438/- crores towards the Petitioner’s alleged tax liability including interest, are illegal, without jurisdiction and without the authority of law. The other relief sought in the Writ Petition is to direct Respondent No. 3 to refund the amount of Rs. 4 crores deposited by the Petitioner on 19th December, 2024 and 18th January, 2025. For the sake of convenience, prayer clauses (a) and (b) are reproduced hereunder:- “a) that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to hold and declare that the actions of the respondent No. 3 in seeking to recover a sum of Rs. 52,39,98,438/- towards the petitioner’s alleged tax liability including interest are- (i) illegal, without jurisdiction and without ....