Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,306 Results

SUNIL ENTERPRISES vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CGST DIVISION-H


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Jan 13, 2020)

These two appeals have been filed before the appellate authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s Sunil Enterprises, B-40, Anupama Mension-II, M. l. Road Jaipur (Hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against the Orders in Original (Hereinafter called as the "impugned orders") passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax Division-H, Jaipur(Hereinafter called as the "adjudication authority")...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. JSW ENERGY LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jan 13, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. The present appeal had be...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
These Three appeals have been filed before the appellate authority under  Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s Sigma Electric Manufacturing Corporation Private Ltd.,(Formerly Sigma Electric Mfg. Pvt Ltd.,) A-134-136, Road No. 12, Vishwakarma Industrial Area, Jaipur ( Here in after also referred to as "the appellant") against the Orders in Original (Here in after called as the "impugned orders") passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Central&nb...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VIKAS GOEL vs. SHANKAR PRASAD SARMA, DEPUTY DIRECTOR


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jan 10, 2020)

This is a second petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in a complaint case No. COMA-137- 2018 registered on 13.11.2018 (Annexure P.2) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurugram under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. In the present case, the complaint has been filed by the Deputy Director, Directorate General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ABB INDIA LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 10, 2020)

1. Rule returnable on 12/02/2020. Mr. Chintan Dave, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents nos.2, 3, and 5. The respondents nos.1 and 4 shall be served by Registered Post Acknowledgment with Due. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having gone through the materials on record, we are of the view that the writ-applicant has made out a strong prima-facie case to have some interim order in its favour. 3. The...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. PARKER HANNIFIN INDIA PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Jan 10, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 101 or the CGST Act, 2017 and the KGST Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it Clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST Act, 2017 and KGST Act, 2017) are the Same except for Certain provisions Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S TIRUPATI TRADERS vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR


(Patna High Court | Jan 9, 2020)

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- (i) For issuance of writ of certiorari, quashing of Assessment Order dated 25.08.2018 and demand notice dated 24.01.2019 for Assessment Year 2013-14 (Annexure- 1 series). (ii) For quashing of assessment order dated 23.08.2018 and demand notice dated 24.01.2019 for Assessment Year 2014-15 (Annexure 1/1 series). (iii) For condoning the delay in fi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petition filed on 11.09.2019 is listed for hearing for the first time today before the Court. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- i) the order dated 16.07.2019 (as contained Annexure-3 Series) passed by the respondent no.2 for the period 2019-20 under section 129(3) of the Bihar Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter called the Act) be quashed. ii) the notice of demand d...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr. Ashok Mohanty, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Sunil Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the Commercial Tax-State. According to Mr. Mohanty, a show cause notice dated 04.11.2019 vide Annexure-3 was issued to the petitioners under Section 73 of the OGST Act, 2017 for non-payment of OGST/CGST for the period June, 2018 to December, 2018 making two things clear. First, that the reply has to be submitted to the show cause notice by ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAJKUMAR MAHESHWARI vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 9, 2020)

1 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “7(a) to quash and set aside the Show Cause Notice dated 04/09/2019 (Annexure “A”) issued by the respondent No.3; (b) pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, to stay the implementation and operation of the Show Cause Notice at Annexure “A” to this petition; (c) direct the respondent No.3 to release...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
24
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).