Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,306 Results

M/S. VILAS CHANDANMAL GANDHI


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jan 15, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Vilas Chandanmal Gandhi, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. a) Whether GST is le...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. KUTTING FUSION HOSPITALITY LLP


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jan 15, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/s. Kutting Fusion Hospitality LLP, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. ANJU KUSHAL JAIN


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jan 15, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the GST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by ANJU KUSHAL JAIN, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. 1. “...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioner has prayed for the following relief: “a) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 26.09.2018 passed by the respondent no. 3 being illegal and without jurisdiction in terms of Section 39, 46, 47 and 50 of the Bihar Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short); b) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certior...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- (i) For issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing of the order in form of show cause notice contained in reference no. ZA100719000010I dated 01.07.2019 issued u/s 73 in form GST DRC-01 passed by the Asst. Commissioner of State Tax, Sasaram Circle, Sasaram, qua the levy of interest of ₹ 19,68,689.12/-. In the order dated 01.07.2019, the claim of Input Tax Credit to the extent of ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has prayed for the following relief: “For quashing/setting aside the order and demand dated 30.05.2019 passed by the learned Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Gandhi Maidan Circle, Patna whereby and whereunder Tax, interest and penalty has been imposed to the tune of ₹ 97,378/- by rejecting the claim of transitional credit of SGST under Section 140 of GST Act, 2017 and other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled on the facts and circumstances of th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The prayers in the above Writ Petition (Civil) are as follows. a) Declare that the GST Registration granted to the 2nd respondent for additional place of business at Room No.19/994 -F, Nasna Building, Puthiyapalam Road, Tali East, Kozhikode, without the consent of the petitioner is illegal, invalid and issued in violation of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. b) Issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ, direction or order commanding the 1st respondent to cancel th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. CHROMACHEMIE LABORATORY PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Jan 14, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the KGST Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST, Act 2017 and SGST, Act 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar pro-visions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean reference to the corresponding similar provisi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KALYAN EXPORTS vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CGST DIVISION-B


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Jan 13, 2020)

The appeal has been filed before the appellate authority under Section 107 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s Shri Kalyan Exports, Vinayak Tower, G-56, Vidyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against the Order in Original No. 29/GST/ITC/Kalyan/2018-19 dated 12.09.2018 (hereinafter called as the “impugned order”) passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST Division-B, VKI Area, Jaipur (hereinafter called as the “adju...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KALYAN EXPORTS vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CGST DIVISION-B


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Jan 13, 2020)

The appeal has been filed before the appellate authority under Section 107 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s Shri Kalyan Exports, Vinayak Tower, G-56, Vidyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against the Order in Original No. 30/GST/ITC/Kalyan/2018-19 dated 12.09.2018 (hereinafter called as the "impugned order") passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST Division-B, VKI Area, Jaipur (hereinafter called as the "adjudicat...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).