Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

M/S. JOHNSON LIFTS PRIVATE LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Apr 20, 2020)

Note: Any appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pro...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. GLOBAL TEXTILE ALLIANCE INDIA PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Apr 20, 2020)

Note: Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lies before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Rulings, Chennai as under Sub-Section (1) of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unles...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. KAVI CUT TOBACCO


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Apr 20, 2020)

Note : Any appeal against the advance ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provis...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. HEAVY VEHICLES FACTORY


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Apr 20, 2020)

Note : Any Appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamilnadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pro...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Apr 20, 2020)

Note : Any appeal against the advance ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pr...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RR INDIA PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Apr 20, 2020)

O R D E R C.M.APPL. 10331/2020 (exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM No.10334/2020 in W.P.(C) 1597/2020 1. This application is filed by the petitioner seeking stay of operation of the impugned order dated 9.3.2020. The application also seeks to set aside the order dated 9.3.2020 passed by the concerned functionary Pr.ADG which confirms the provisional attachment orders dated 2.12.2019 and 3.12.2019. Relief is also sought to set aside the order dated 20.03.2020...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHREE SAWAI MANOHARLAL RATHI


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Apr 19, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS The applicant has submitted that he is an individual having not engaged in any business. His receipts are only from savings, personal loans and advances and deposits, which are reflected in the Income Tax Returns. 2. The applicant has further submitted that his estimated receipts for the F.Y. 2018-19 is likely to be totally Rs.20,12,000/-, which includes,(i) Rent receipts: Rs.9,84,000/-, (ii) Bank interest: Rs.3,000/-, (iii) Interest on PPF deposit:Rs.2,76,000/- and (iv)...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SANDEEP GOYAL vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Supreme Court | Apr 17, 2020)

ORDER The allegation against the petitioner is that he has created about 555 fake firms and has committed fraud to the tune of ₹ 74,00,00,000/- (Rupees seventy four crore only). Mr. K.M. Natraj, learned additional solicitor general, submits that the investigation is still pending and more number of fake firms created by the petitioner are being detected. It is not in dispute that the maximum punishment to be imposed on the petitioner, if convicted, is five years. It is also not ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAJINDER BASSI AND OTHERS vs. STATE OF PUNJAB


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Apr 17, 2020)

1. The petitioners, against whom there are allegations of having caused loss to State-Exchequer to the tune of ₹ 20 crores appx. by evasion of payment of GST, seek grant of interim bail, mainly on account of the prevelant conditions of spread of COVID-19 virus. 2. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioners that since a large number of inmates are confined in New District Jail, Nabha and the threat of spread of pandemic COVID-19 still looms large and since a policy has in fact be...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 24.09.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Gujarat State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, vide its letter dated 22.02.2019 had forwarded an application dated 04.01.2019 filed by the Applicant No. 1 to the Standing Committee on Anti-profi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


18
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).