Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

ANIL KUMAR AGRAWAL


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | May 4, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 1. Mr. Anil Kumar Agrawal, Flat # H-801, ETA Garden, Magadi Road, Opp Binny Mills, Bangalore 560023, an unregistered person having User ID 291900000213ART, has filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000-00 eac...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AJANTA SOYA LIMITED vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST DIVISION-C, ALWAR


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Apr 30, 2020)

This appeal has been filed before the appellate authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act. 2017 by M/s Ajanta Soya Limited, RIICO Industrial Area, Phase-III, Bhiwadi, District-Alwar (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against the  Order-in-Original No. Refund-GST/BHD-C/2018-19/RFD-06/149 dated 05.02 2019 (hereinafter called as the "impugned order") passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax Division-C...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This appeal has been filed before the appellate authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s. Metacube Business Ventures Pvt Ltd., C-677, 4C, Macheda, Sikar Road, Jaipur (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against the Order in Original No, Nil dated 04.02.2019 (hereinafter referred to as the “impugned order”) passed by the State Tax Officer, Circle-C, Ward-3, Bhilwara (Rajasthan) (hereinafter referred to as the “...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SH. RAHUL SHARMA, M/S LOCAL CIRCLES INDIA PVT. LTD vs. M/S. SAMSONITE INDIA


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Apr 28, 2020)

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 24.09.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that an application dated 30.07.2018 was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017, by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in res...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SRI MALAI MAHADESHWARA SWAMY KSHETHRA DEVELOPMENT


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Apr 28, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CENTRAL GOODS & SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 AND UNDER 98(4) OF THE KARNATAKA GOODS & SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 1. M/s Sri Malai Mahadeshwara Swamy Kshethra Development Authority, MM Temple Building, MM Hills, Sankama Nilaya Road, MM Hills Road, Chamarajanagar-571490 (hereinafter called “the applicant”), having GSTIN number 29AABCI1411R1ZD, has filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

L.G. ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Apr 27, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by M/s. L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd., F-601-648, Road No. 6, Vishwakarma Industrial Area, Jaipur (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against Order-in-Original No. 09/E-way Bill/CGST Div-B/18-19/7246, dated 6-12-2018 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order”) passed by Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax Division-B, Jaipur (hereinafter also ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s L.G. Electronics India, Pvt Ltd., F-601-648, Road No.6, Vishwakarma Industrial Area, Jaipur (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against Order-in-Original No.10/E-way Bill/CGST Div-B/18-19/7249 dated 06.12.2018 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order”) passed by Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax Division-B, Jaipur (hereinafter also refer...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s Baba Super Mineral Pvt. Ltd., office No. 11, 4th Floor, Alankar Plaza, Central Spine, Vidyadhar Nagar, Jaipur-302039 (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against the Order-in-Original No. 65/GST/ITC/BSMPL/2018-19 dated 10.12.2018(hereinafter called as the  “impugned order”) passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods Service Tax Division-B, Jaipu...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. INVENTAA LED LIGHTS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Apr 24, 2020)

Note : Any Appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pr...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAJESH RAMA VARMA


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Apr 24, 2020)

Note : Any Appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pr...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


18
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).