Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,170 Results

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.K. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. The petitioner has preferred the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 21.10.2019 passed in Appeal No.1130/2019 by respondent no.3 under Section 129 (3) of the U.P. G.S.T. Act and C.G.S.T. Act, 2017/ Section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017. It is not disputed that the impugned order is appealable under Section 112 of the C.G.S.T. Act, ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. AGARWAL COAL CORPORATION PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Jun 8, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS 1. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE: 1.1. M/s Agarwal Coal Corporation Private Limited (“Applicant” for brevity) is engaged in business of trading of coal in India and for the same Applicant undertakes purchase of coal from domestic markets as well as imports from overseas. 1.2. On purchase of coal, the Applicant has submitted that GST is paid @ 5% (on intra-state and inter-state supply as the case may be) and on import of coal from overseas market, IGST is paid @ 5...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. JABALPUR HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Jun 8, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. M/s JABALPUR HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant) was established with an object to construct Hotel in Jabalpur at Mauza Ghana Khasara No 195/14. 195/2, 194 Nagpur Road, Jabalpur. The Applicant is having a GST registration with GSTIN 23AADCM7397N1ZU. 2. The provisions of the CGST Act and...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The brief facts leading to filing of instant case is that the petitioner is a private limited company engaged in outdoor catering service. According to the revenue, the petitioner did not file the return resulted into a show cause notice for cancellation of registration dated 9th January 2020, Ext.P2. The aforementioned notice was replied and thereafter issued a cancellation order dated 11.01.2020. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the show cause notice...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

REMANKHAN BELIN vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 8, 2020)

1. Heard Mr. Varis V. Isani, learned advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Tirthraj Pandya, learned AGP for the respondents on advance copy. 2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 14.5.2020 passed under Section 130 of the GST Act in Form GST MOV-11 at Annexure-A to the petition. 3. The predominant ground raised in the petition is that no opportunity of actual hearing was given. Mr. Pandya, relying upon ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Sri Rishi Raj Kapoor, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.K. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. The petitioner has preferred the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 19.11.2019 passed in Appeal No.GST-06/2019 by respondent no.2 under Section 129 (3) of the C.G.S.T. Act, 2017/ Section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017 and tax and penalty order 4.12.2018 passed by respondent no.3 under Section 129 (3) of the C.G.S....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Sri Vishwjit, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.K. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. The petitioner has preferred the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the seizure orders MOV 06 dated 31.7.2018 and consequential order MOV 09 dated 2.8.2018, passed by respondent no. 3 and also order dated 27.11.2019, passed by respondent no. 2 under Section 107(11) of the GST Act and has also prayed for a direction to the responden...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Sri Rishi Raj Kapoor, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.K. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. The petitioner has preferred the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 26.11.2019 passed in Appeal No.GST-02/19 by respondent no.2 under Section 129 (3) of the U.P. G.S.T. Act and C.G.S.T. Act, 2017/ Section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017 and tax and penalty order No.227 dated 5.9.2018 passed by respondent no.3 under...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UFLIX INDUSTRIES vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Jun 8, 2020)

CM Appl. 11935/2020 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3368/2020 & CM Appl.11936/2020 The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing Present writ petition has been filed challenging the attachment order dated 18th March, 2020 issued by respondent No.3 on the ground that it has been issued without jurisdiction. A perusal of the pap...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BRIGHT-VIJAYWARGI (JV) vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jun 5, 2020)

The matter has been taken up through video-conferencing in the light of the pandemic Covid-19 situation and as per instructions. 2. This writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the issuance of a writ, in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to issue password to the petitioner against the provisional ID for TIN 06461950758 allotted to it so that it can migrate itself from VAT to GST regime and also to issue GST Registration C...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


15
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).