Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,170 Results

It is submitted by the petitioner that the petitioner is not being able to file an online application, which is the only present mode available, regarding its GST Transition Credit, since the concerned website of the respondent-authorities is not functioning properly. As such, since the last date for filing such application has been fixed on June 30, 2020, the petitioner prays merely for being able to present the application prior to such cut-off date, if necessary manually. It is submitt...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HARI OM COMPANY vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 11, 2020)

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “[A] This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside detention order dated 12.03.2020 ion Form GST MOV-6 (annexed at Annexure A) and confiscation notice dated 12.03.2020 in Form GST MOV-10 (annexed at Annexure B). [b]...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
2. Learned Assistant Solicitor General of India Mr. Devang Vyas waives service of Notice on behalf of Union of India and learned AGP Mr. Utkarsh Sharma waives service of Notice on behalf of respondent State and its authorities. 3. This is a petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking directions to the respondents to permit the petitioner to file revision of GST TRAN-1 electronically or manually and allow the credit of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) of ₹ 16,07,556/- for ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SK IMPEX vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 11, 2020)

2. Learned Assistant Solicitor General of India Mr. Devang Vyas waives service of Notice on behalf of Union of India and learned AGP Mr. Utkarsh Sharma waives service of Notice on behalf of respondent State and its authorities. 3. This is a petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking directions to the respondents to permit the petitioner to file revision of GST TRAN-1 electronically or manually and allow the credit of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) of ₹ 16,61,040/- for ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

COLGATE PALMOLIVE INDIA LTD. vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 11, 2020)

1. This is a petition filed by the company having its Principal Place of Business at Vadodara which is the warehouse used for storage for finished goods and having its manufacturing unit at Sanand, Ahmedabad. It has a single GST registration number both for the factory and warehouse under the provisions of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the GST Act’). 2. What has aggrieved the present petit...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R This petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘the Cr.P.C.’) for granting anticipatory bail. The case of the petitioner is that the respondent had issued notice/summons to the petitioner as per Section 70 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘the CGST Act’) summoning him to appear before the Authorized Officer finally on 12.05.2020 (before filing the petition and after fi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

STONE INDIA


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Jun 10, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by M/s. Stone India, B-30, Behind Goverdhan Bari, Khatipura Road, Jaipur-302012 (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against the Order-in-Original No. 100/GST/ITC/Stone/2018-19, dated 27-3-2019 (hereinafter called as the “impugned order”) passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax Division-B, Jaipur (hereinafter called as the “adju...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The Court proceedings have been conducted by means of creating a Virtual Court with the help of technology, so as to maintain distance between the staff, Advocates and the Presiding Judge. Heard Mr. D. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. C. Keyal, learned ASGI for the respondents. Mr. Borah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he would like to withdraw these writ petitions and further seeks liberty of this Court to file it afresh by chall...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. V.E. COMMERCIAL VEHICLES LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Jun 9, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017) (Rectified order of order number 9/2020, dated 02.06.2020 under section 102 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. Order was passed under above mentioned case on dated 02.06.2020 and it was ruled that tax leviable on the services on which applicant has sough ruling wo...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. ATRIWAL AMUSEMENT PARK


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Jun 9, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. M/s Atriwal Amusement Park (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant) is engaged in construction of Water Park, for construction of the same various components & services will be used. All such components & services are taxable under GST. The Applicant is not registered. However the Applicant has declared that he is desir...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


15
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).