Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,161 Results

Writ petition is filed for quashing Annexure-A which is the order dated 23.05.2020 passed by respondent No.2 and Annexure-A-1- Order dated 04.06.2020 passed by respondent No.2. Petitioner has sought the relief under Article 226 of Constitution of India. 2. The petitioner M/s.L& T Hydrocarbon Engineering Limited Modular Fabrication Facility, a SEZ Judge Unit in L & T Shipbuilding Limited. The crux of the claim is that the petitioner concern is engaged in procurement, fabrication, c...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRI KAMAL NAYAN SINGHANIA vs. M/S. ELEGANT PROPERTIES


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jun 18, 2020)

1. This Report dated 10.10.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 133 (4) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 30.08.2018, to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an application dated 29.05.2018 filed by the Applicant No. 1 which was originally examined by the Screen...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Read Order dated 26.05.2020:- “The appellant is a private limited company engaged in carrying specialist service of dry cleaning, providing such services to hotels, airline companies and the like. The appellant had been delaying payment of Central Goods and Services tax as also the State Goods and Services Tax from year 2017 onwards. Payments were made with long delay, on which no action was taken. However, when there was consistent default and the dues mounted uncontrollably, the d...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

C.P. MARBLE vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jun 18, 2020)

Hearing conducted through Video Conferencing. 1. The Petitioner through instant petition is challenging vires of Rule 117(1A) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘Rules’) and seeking direction to Respondent to permit Petitioner to electronically upload form TRAN-I or avail input tax credit (for short ‘ITC’) in monthly return GSTR-3B. 2. The Petitioner-a proprietary concern, is engaged in the trading of Marble Stone and registered with Responde...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AMBA INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jun 18, 2020)

1. The Petitioner through instant petition is challenging vires of Rule 117(1A) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘Rules’) and seeking direction to Respondent to permit Petitioner to electronically upload form TRAN-I or avail input tax credit (for short ‘ITC’) in monthly return GSTR-3B. 2. The Petitioner-a partnership firm, engaged in the business of trading of S.S. Flats, is registered with Respondent-GST Authorities under Central Goods and Ser...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AMARJEET SINGH YADAV vs. M/S. RADICON INFRASTRUCTURE & HOUSING PRIVATE LIMI..


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jun 17, 2020)

1. A Report dated 05.12.2018, was received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 in which it was stated that an application dated 26.12.2017 was filed before the Uttar Pradesh State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering by the Applicant No. 1, alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purchase of a flat in the Respondent’s project “Vedantam”,...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MANGLA HOIST P. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS


(Delhi High Court | Jun 17, 2020)

ORDER 1. The petitioner seeks directions to the respondents/Union of India; Commissioner, CGST, Delhi South; Superintendent of Range and Goods and Services Tax Council to open the Portal to enable it to file its claim of CENVAT tax credit as on 30th June, 2017, in Form Trans-1. The second relief in the present petition is for declaring Rule 117 of the CGST Rules, 2017 as ultra vires and quashing the same. 2. Mr. Bhatia, learned counsel for the petitioner states that despite repeated ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MEGA JEWELS PVT. LTD. vs.


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Jun 16, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, by M/s. Mega Jewels Pvt. Ltd. (EOU), F-57, EPIP, Sitapura Industrial Area, Jaipur (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against the Order-in-Original No. CGST DIV-F/30/2019/1036, dated 2-5-2019 (hereinafter called as the “impugned order”) passed by the Joint Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax Division-F, Jaipur (hereinafter called as the “adjudica...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner, Society through the instant writ petition has approached this Court with the following prayers: “(i) To quash Exts.P4 to P4(za) orders issued by the 1st respondent by the issue of a writ of certiorari or such other writ or order or direction. (ii) To direct the respondents to grant validity for Ext.P2 registration from 01.07.2017 by the issue of a writ of mandamus or such other writ or order or direction.” 2. Prima facie, the orders Exts.P4 to P4(za) are ap...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MITHA RAM vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jun 16, 2020)

The matter has been taken up through video-conferencing on account of lockdown due to outbreak of pandemic COVID-19. Petitioner-Mitha Ram who is stated to be aged 29 years, has filed the present petition inter alia praying for grant of regular bail in complaint No.2355/2019 dated 13.08.2019, under Section 132(1) a,b,c of Punjab Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, filed by respondent No.2 before Ld. JMIC, Amloh, District Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitione...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


14
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).