Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,161 Results

M/S. HARYANA PETRO OILS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jun 19, 2020)

1. The Petitioner through instant petition is challenging vires of Rule 117(1A) of Haryana GST Rules, 2017 (for short ‘Rules’) and seeking direction to Respondent to permit Petitioner to electronically upload form TRAN-I in order to avail credit of excess VAT reflected in Returns, as due to technical glitches on the GST Portal, the petitioner could not file Form TRAN-I. 2. The Petitioner-a partnership firm, engaged in the business of refining of black oil, is registered with R...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S MODERN MOTOR WORKS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jun 19, 2020)

Hearing conducted through Video Conferencing. 1. The Petitioner through instant petition is challenging vires of Rule 117(1A) of Haryana GST Rules, 2017 (for short ‘Rules’) and seeking direction to Respondent to permit Petitioner to electronically upload form TRAN-I in order to avail credit of excess VAT reflected in Returns, as due to technical glitches on the GST Portal, the petitioner could not file Form TRAN-I. 2. The Petitioner-a partnership firm, engaged in the busin...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, a managing partner of firm under the name and style “Golden Traders” in Malappuram District, is dealing with the trading of areca-nut. The petitioner has been issued registration under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act- 2017, for the purpose of assessment of GST and had been filing returns from time to time, which is marked as Exhibits P1 to P6. 2. Sri.K.R.Avinash, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that there was a minor del...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S CEAMEN ELECTRONICS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jun 19, 2020)

1. The Petitioner through instant petition is challenging vires of Rule 117(1A) of Central GST Rules, 2017 (for short ‘Rules’) and seeking direction to Respondent to permit Petitioner to electronically upload form TRAN-I in order to avail credit of excess VAT reflected in Returns, as due to technical glitches on the GST Portal, the petitioner could not file Form TRAN-I. 2. The Petitioner-a partnership firm, engaged in the business of trading of Electronic items, is registered ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRI DURGA TRADERS vs. STATE TAX OFFICER


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 19, 2020)

1 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a proprietor of a proprietary firm engaged in the business of trading in groundnuts and other agricultural products, has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. Your Lordships may be pleased to admit this petition. B. Your Lordships may be pleased to allow this petition. C. Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing respondent No...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHIV SHAKTI UDHYOG vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jun 19, 2020)

Hearing conducted through Video Conferencing. 1. The Petitioner through instant petition is challenging vires of Rule 117(1A) of Haryana GST Rules, 2017 (for short ‘Rules’) and seeking direction to Respondent to permit Petitioner to electronically upload form TRAN-I in order to avail credit of excess VAT reflected in Returns, as due to technical glitches on the GST Portal, the petitioner could not file Form TRAN-I. 2. The Petitioner-a proprietary concern, engaged in the bu...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM APPL. 12895/2020 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3620/2020 The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. It is pertinent to mention that present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to refund ₹ 1,40,99,149/- due to the petitioner along with interest which the respondents have failed to release despite two orders dated...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7425-7428/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-05-2020 in WPC No. 11040/2018 05-05-2020 in WPC No. 196/2019 05-05-2020 in WPC No. 8496/2019 05-05-2020 in WPC No. 13203/2019 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) ___________ O R D E R  Issue notice. To be heard along with SLP(C) No. 26626 of 2019 and SLP (C) D. No. 38404 of 2019. In the meantime, the operation of the impugned ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PRERNA EXPORT


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Jun 18, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by M/s. Prerna Export, Shivaji Nagar, Madanganj, Kishangarh, Rajasthan-305801 (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against Order No. 04/E-Way Bill/CGST Div-B/2018-19/1315 FORM GST MOV-09, dated 8-6-2019 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order”) passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax Division-B, Jaipur (hereinafter also referr...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM APPL. 12795/2020 1. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 3597/2020 3. The Petitioner has preferred the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs: “It is therefore respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or certiorari any other similar writ or order or direction, directing the respondent no.2 to disclose as...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


14
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).