Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA) The present writ petition is filed seeking for the following reliefs: i) A writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to No.2 to revive the appeal bearing No. AD2905240155063 and hear it in accordance with law. ii) A writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 31.08.2024 bearing No. JDN/CR/No.118/2024 ANNEXURE-J-1 passed by the Respondent No.2. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that being aggrieved...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MOHD. SHAHZAR vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Nov 28, 2024)

ORDER PER: JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK Heard finally with the consent of the parties. 2. Present petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India taking exception to the order dated 29.02.2024 (Annexure P/1) passed by the Joint Commissioner (Appeal), whereby the appeal preferred by the appellant against the order dated 22.08.2023, whereby the application for revocation of cancellation was rejected, has been dismissed. 3. Precisely stated, facts of the case are tha...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order 24.04.2024 on the premise that it traverses beyond the Show Cause Notice thereby denying the petitioner's opportunity to put forth his case. 2. The petitioner is engaged in execution of works contract and is registered under Goods and Services Act, 2017. During the relevant period viz., 2018-19, the petitioner filed its return and paid the appropriate taxes. However, during the scrutiny of the petitioner's...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned notice in the Form ASMT-10 dated 26.09.2024 issued by the 1st respondent and consequently, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to unblock the electronic credit ledger/electronic cash ledger (hereinafter called as “ECL”) of the petitioner. 2. Mr.Satish Parasaran, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had made the following submissions: 2.1 In this case, the main grievance of the petiti...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHREE SHYAMJI TRADERS vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Nov 28, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. Heard Mr. Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arvind Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the State. By means of present petition, the petitioner is praying, inter alia, for the following relief: "i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 31.3.2022 passed by respondent no. 3 in Appeal No. GST/0134/2021 and GST/0042/2021 (AY 2020-21) (Annexure No. 12). ii) iss...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SYNDICATE BANK vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES


(Delhi High Court | Nov 27, 2024)

ORDER CM APPL. 69052/2024 (Ex.) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 16372/2024 & CM APPL. 69051/2024 (Interim Relief) 1. The writ petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by the order dated 20 August 2024 passed by the Goods and Services Tax [“GST”] Officer concluding proceedings referable to Section 73 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 2. On going through the final order passed, we find ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VINIT KUMAR JAIN vs. THE STATE OF ASSAM & OTHERS


(Gauhati High Court | Nov 27, 2024)

ORDER PER Heard Mr. R.S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel SGST. 2] In this case, the petitioner was issued a Summary of the Show Cause Notice dated 29.09.2023 in the GST DRC-01. In the said Summary of the Show Cause Notice, it was mentioned that the Show Cause Notice was attached. Along with the said Summary of the Show Cause Notice, there was an attachment to the determination of tax dated 29.09.2023. The petitioner did not...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) Heard both the sides finally and perused the papers. 2. The petitioner, which was registered with Goods and Service Tax authority being engaged in the business of supplying labour, is aggrieved by cancellation of its registration by the order of respondent no. 4 dated 13.06.2023, on the ground that as required by Rule 21 (d) read with Rule 10A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, the petitioner had not furnished the bank details. 3. The ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ANAND TRADERS vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Delhi High Court | Nov 27, 2024)

ORDER PER 1. Although we had accorded time to the respondents to file their replies, we find that the issue itself falls within a narrow compass and there would perhaps be no justification to continue the writ petition any further.  2. The solitary grievance which was raised was with respect to the negative blocking of the Electronic Credit Ledger [ECL] of the writ petitioner by the respondents in purported exercise of powers conferred by Rule 86A of the Central Go...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JAY


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Nov 27, 2024)

ORDER (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. In terms of Section 103 (1) of the Act, Advance ruling pronounced by the Authority under chapter XVII of the Act shall be binding only- a) On the applicant who had sought it in respect of any matter referred to in sub-section (2) of Section 97 for Advance ruling. b) On the concerned officer or the jurisdictional officer in...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)