Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


1
TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option
Active Filters:
State - Jammu and Kashmir ✔

  43 Results

KAPIL KUMAR KHATTAR vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Apr 8, 2025)

JUDGMENT Sanjeev Kumar “J” 1. This review petition by M/s Kapil Kumar Khattar through its Partner Sunil Khattar seeks review of our judgment dated 3rd November, 2023 passed in WP(C) No.1379/2021 titled M/s Kapil Kumar Khattar v. Union of India and others. 2. Before we advert to the grounds for review urged by the learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner, we deem it necessary to give few background facts leading to the filing of this review petition. 3. V...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

V.M. TIMBER INDUSTRIES vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Apr 4, 2025)

JUDGMENT SANJEEV KUMAR 1. The petitioner is an industrial unit engaged in the production and supply of cement to various manufacturers and customers across the country. The petitioner is aggrieved of the refund orders dated 11th July, 2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, CGST Division, Samba [‘respondent No. 3’] in terms of notification No. F.No.(1)2017-DBA-II/NER dated 05.10.2017 and has challenged the same primarily on the ground that the rejection of refund claims by...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AQUA POLYMERS vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Apr 4, 2025)

JUDGMENT SANJEEV KUMAR 1. The petitioner is an industrial unit engaged in the production and supply of Blow Molding Water Tanks to various manufacturers and customers across the country. The petitioner is aggrieved of the refund orders dated 1st April, 2022 and 20th June, 2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, CGST Division, Samba [‘respondent No. 3’] in terms of notification No. F.No. 10(1)2017-DBA-II/NER dated 05.10.2017 and has challenged the same primarily on the grou...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

J&K CEMENT CORPORATION vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Apr 4, 2025)

JUDGMENT SANJEEV KUMAR 1. The petitioner is an industrial unit engaged in the production and supply of cement to various manufacturers and customers across the country. The petitioner is aggrieved of the refund order dated 20th June, 2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, CGST Division, Samba [‘respondent No. 3’] in terms of notification No. F.No. 10(1)2017-DBA-II/NER dated 05.10.2017 and has challenged the same primarily on the ground that the rejection of refund claim b...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHIVA INDUSTRIES vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Apr 4, 2025)

JUDGMENT Sanjeev Kumar “J” 1. The petitioner is an industrial unit engaged in the production and supply of cement to various manufacturers and customers across the country. The petitioner is aggrieved of the refund orders dated 22nd April, 2022 and 23rd June, 2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, CGST Division, Samba [“respondent No.3”] in terms of notification No.F.No.10(1)2017-DBA-II/NER dated 05.10.2017 and has challenged the same primarily on the ground t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KHURSHID BIBI & OTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Mar 24, 2025)

ORDER 1. Impugned in this petition, filed by the petitioners, is a show cause notice dated 31.07.2024 issued by State Taxes Officer, Circle Q-Jammu, J&K [“STO”], whereby the predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners late Wali Mohd was asked to submit reply by or before 30.08.2024. He was also given option of personal hearing. The impugned show cause notice was followed by a reminder issued by STO on 26.09.2024 addressed to late Wali Mohd 2. The impugned notice, follow...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LUPIN LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Mar 19, 2025)

ORDER 1. Impugned in this petition, filed by the petitioner by invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is an Office Memorandum bearing F. No. 15/1/2020-GSTSS dated 26.07.2021 issued by Respondent No. 1 (Annexure-I) as also an Office Memorandum bearing F. No. 116/19/2020-CX-3 dated 05.08.2021 issued by Respondent No. 3 (Annexure-II). 2. The office memorandum(s) are challenged by the petitioner primarily on the ground that the same have been issued in violation of the judgmen...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PUNCHOK WANGTAK vs. COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES DEPARTMENT & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Mar 19, 2025)

ORDER 1. By way of instant petition, the petitioner-firm has sought the following main reliefs: i) A direction to the respondent Nos. 1&2 to the effect that inadvertent error in furnishing details in GST return needs to be recognized and permitted to be corrected by the department as it will turn no loss of government revenue and to allow rectification/correction of the GSTR-1 form either manually or through online portal. ii) Further direction to respondent Nos. 1&2 with ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Mar 3, 2025)

ORDER 1. Impugned in this petition filed by the petitioner-Bank is a show-cause notice issued by the Commissioner Central Goods and Services Tax, Jammu dated 30.11.2024 whereby, the petitioner-Bank has been called upon to show cause as to why an action may not be taken against it under the provision of Jammu and Kashmir GST Act, 2017 or the rules made thereunder or any other law for the time being in force. 2. From a plain reading of the show-cause notice, we find that the Commissione...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NEW KING PLUS INDUSTRIES vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Feb 7, 2025)

ORDER PER 01. Impugned in this petition filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge an order bearing No. 2039-43/GS-17/DCST/APPLI/K dated 29th November, 2024 and order dated 17th November, 2023, passed by the respondent No. 3, including a show cause notice dated 7th June, 2023, issued by the respondent No. 3. 02. The impugned orders are challenged by the petitioner primarily on the ground that the impugned show cause notice...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)