^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SHRINE ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX
(Telangana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SUJOY PAUL
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

Pet. Counsel

Praveen K Nair

Res. Counsel

Bokaro Sapna

Petitioner / Applicant	SHRINE ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent	ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX
Court	Telangana High Court
State	Telangana
Date	Jul 8, 2024
Order No.	Writ Petition No. 15425 of 2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 10340
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER PER HON’BLE SP, J. Heard Sri Praveen K Nair, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms.B.Sapna Reddy, learned Junior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department, for respondent Nos.1 and 2; and Sri B.Mukherjee, learned counsel representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.3. 2. With the consent, finally heard. 3. This petition is directed against the impugned Order-in-Original, dated 14.09.2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, pursuant to a notice issued by the Department, filed his reply, dated 18.08.2022 (Exhibit P5). The respondents issued another notice, dated 17.04.2023. The petitioner could not file response to this notice. Thereafter, the respondents passed the impugned order, dated 14.09.2023 and did not give any opportunity of personal hearing. 4. The first limb of argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is based on Section 75(4) of GST Act, 2017 (for short....