^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

RAYEES METALS vs. DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER
(Telangana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SUJOY PAUL
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

Pet. Counsel

Goondla Venkateswarlu

Res. Counsel

---

Petitioner / Applicant	RAYEES METALS
Respondent	DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER
Court	Telangana High Court
State	Telangana
Date	Jul 8, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION No. 17400 of 2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 10714
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 29

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER (per Hon’ble SP,J) Sri Goondla Venkateswarlu, learned counsel appears for the petitioner and Sri P. Sri Harsha, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, for the respondents. 2. With the consent, finally heard. 3. The singular pivotal question before us is whether the show cause notice for cancellation of registration and action of suspending the registration by order dated 29.02.2024 is justifiable and proper or not. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner advanced singular point by contending that only so-called ‘reason’ shown in the impugned show-cause notice dated 29.02.2024 is mere reproduction of language of Section 29(2)(e) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and does not contain necessary details on the strength of which such a ‘conclusion’ has been drawn. It is submitted that the notice is so cryptic that no one can file any eff....