^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

PADHGELWAR SACHIN KUMAR vs. THE UNION OF INDIA
(Telangana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SUJOY PAUL
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

Pet. Counsel

Ponnam Ashok Goud

Res. Counsel

Gadi Praveen Kumar

Petitioner / Applicant	PADHGELWAR SACHIN KUMAR
Respondent	THE UNION OF INDIA
Court	Telangana High Court
State	Telangana
Date	Jul 8, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION No. 16635 OF 2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 10212
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER ( Per Hon’ble SP, J ) Heard Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri B. Mukherjee, learned counsel representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent Nos.1 and 4; Learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent No.3 and Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC for respondent No.2. 2. With the consent, finally heard. 3. Challenge mounted in this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to an Order-in-Original No.16 of 2024, dated 19.03.2024. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was earlier running ginning mill. The petitioner intended to close down the said industry and accordingly preferred an application for cancellation of registration in prescribed form. The Department was kind enough in passing the order for cancellation of registration on 08.07.2022 (Annexure-P3). By taking this Court to the said order, it i....