Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

P.V. RAMANA REDDY, G. SRINIVASA RAJU, VENKATA SATYA DHARMAVATHAR BOLLINA, BALARAMA KRISHNA MANDAVA, M/S. VS FERROUS ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED, SMT. JAGANNAGARI RAGAVI REDDY, CHALLA DURGA ADI DEVA VARA PRASAD, TELAPOLU RAM PRASAD vs. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
(Telangana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
P. KESHAVA RAO
Pet. Counsel
R. Raghunandan Rao
Kailash Nath
T. Niranjan Reddy
Res. Counsel
K. M. Nataraj
B. Narasimha Sarma
K. Lakshman

Petitioner / Applicant

P.V. RAMANA REDDY, G. SRINIVASA RAJU, VENKATA SATYA DHARMAVATHAR BOLLINA, BALARAMA KRISHNA MANDAVA, M/S. VS FERROUS ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED, SMT. JAGANNAGARI RAGAVI REDDY, CHALLA DURGA ADI DEVA VARA PRASAD, TELAPOLU RAM PRASAD

Respondent UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
Court Telangana High Court
State

Telangana

Date Apr 18, 2019
Order No.

WRIT PETITION Nos.4764, 4769, 4892, 5074, 5130, 5329, 6952 And 7583 of 2019

Citation

2019(4) TAXREPLY 2303
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

Challenging the summons issued by the Superintendent (Anti Evasion) of the Hyderabad GST Commissionerate, under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘CGST Act’) and the invocation of the penal provisions under Section 69 of the Act, the Directors (Past and/or present) of a few Private Limited Companies, a Chief Financial Officer of a company and the Partner of a Partnership Firm have come up with the above writ petitions. 2. We have heard Mr. R. Raghunandan Rao and Mr. T. Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. K.M.Nataraj, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the Union of India. Facts in brief 3. Since the facts out of which these writ petitions arise, differ marginally from each other, we shall bring out the facts of each case separately: (i) Brief facts in WP No.4764 of 2019: The petitioner in this writ petition is the Managing Director of a Company, by name, I....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
20
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).