^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

DHANRAJ SINGHAL vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
(Rajasthan High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Pet. Counsel

Sudhir Jain

Res. Counsel

Ganesh Saini

R.b. Mathur

Petitioner / Applicant	DHANRAJ SINGHAL
Respondent	STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court	Rajasthan High Court
State	Rajasthan
Date	Sep 28, 2020
Order No.	S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6278/2020
Citation	2020(9) TAXREPLY 3381
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with Case File No.PS/CCT/2020/511 dated 31.01.2020 of Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Anti Evasion Circle, Commercial Tax Department, Kota, Rajasthan for the offence(s) under Sections 132(1), (b) and (c) of Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 punishable under Section 132(1)(i) read with Section 132(5) of Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that adjudication as to levy of tax payable is yet to be made. He submits that although, notice for levy of penalty has been issued; but, the same has not been adjudicated upon by the respondents. Learned counsel submits that allegation of issuing invoices without supplying the goods, has been levelled against as many as 26 firms; but, none of them has been implicated as an accused.....