Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

ANIL KUMAR GUPTA vs. UNION OF INDIA
(Rajasthan High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PANKAJ BHANDARI
Pet. Counsel
Pankaj Ghiya
Shahid Hasan
Pawan Sharma
Res. Counsel
Anand Sharma

Petitioner / Applicant

ANIL KUMAR GUPTA
Respondent UNION OF INDIA
Court Rajasthan High Court
State

Rajasthan

Date Feb 19, 2021
Order No.

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15605/2020

Citation

2021(2) TAXREPLY 3914
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 2. F.I.R. No.IV (06) 248/ AE/ALWAR/2020 was registered at Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences) Jaipur (Raj.) for offence under Sections 132(1)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that in the initial application, there was an allegation with regard to wrongful claim of input tax credit to the tune of ₹ 5.27 Crore, however, in the complaint that was filed before the Court, wrongful claim of input tax is to the tune of ₹ 5.88 Crore. It is also contended that all these firms which are stated to be bogus firms were shown in the portal of the Department and three firms are still existing on the portal of the Department. It is also contended that petitioner is not in the management of any of the firms. 4. It is further contended that there was an actual movement of the goods, which is established by toll naka receipt, wherein ....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)