^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

9 STAR TRADERS vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) NAMPALLY & OTHERS
(Telangana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SUJOY PAUL
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

Pet. Counsel

Vijay Kumar Panuganti

Res. Counsel

P. Sri Harsha

Swaroop Oorilla

Petitioner / Applicant	9 STAR TRADERS
Respondent	THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) NAMPALLY & OTHERS
Court	Telangana High Court
State	Telangana
Date	Aug 8, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION No. 21473 of 2024
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 12094
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 29

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER (per Hon’ble SP,J) Sri Vijay Kumar Panugnati, learned counsel, appears for the petitioner and Sri P.Sri Harsha, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, appears for the respondents. 2. With the consent finally heard. 3. The singular ground of attack to impugned show cause notice for cancellation of registration dated 29.02.2024 is that the said notice only reproduces the statutory language of Section 29(2)(e) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short “the Act”), without disclosing the factual details on the strength of which alleged breach is committed by the petitioner. In other words, said impugned show cause notice is not a reasoned one and therefore, the petitioner is deprived to file effective reply. It is submitted that the point is squarely covered by recent order of this Court passed in W.P.No.20080 of 2024. 4. Learned Assistant Government ....