Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,064 Results

MLJ IMPEX LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jun 24, 2020)

Heard Sri Shubham Agrwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Krishna Ji Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3 and Sri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent no.5 and learned Standing counsel for the State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall file counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Two weeks, thereafter, is granted to the counsel for the respondents to file rejoinder. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner h...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Learned advocate-on-record of the petitioner undertakes to affirm and stamp the petition as per the Rules within 48 hours of resumption of normal functioning of the Court. The petition is taken up through video conference on the basis of such undertaking. The points of law is that the writ petitioner has raised in this writ petition whether the non-allowance of transitional Credit on account of inputs held in stock as on the appointed date under Section 140(3) of the CGST/SGST A...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAJESH ARORA vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Supreme Court | Jun 23, 2020)

ORDER We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The special leave petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. Pending applications shall also stand disposed of. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ABDUL SALEEM. A.I vs. STATE TAX OFFICER


(Kerala High Court | Jun 23, 2020)

Petitioner, instead of availing alternative remedy of appeal qua limiting the claim of refund has approached this Court under Article 226 of the constitution of India. It is settled law that in order to bring the case within the realm of judicial review, it is imperative for the petitioner to make out a case of gross illegality, irregularity and without jurisdiction or against the principles of natural justice. However, no such material has been placed on record to form opinion. 2. The fa...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the applicant. The applicant is before this Court for a direction to initiate contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for wilful disobedience of the order dated 12.09.2019 passed in Writ-C No.22751 of 2019 (M/s Maa Vindhya Vasini Constructions v. State of U.P. & Ors.), which for ready reference is quoted as under:- "1. Heard Sri Bidhan Chandra Rai, learned counsel for petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondents....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R CM Appl. 13149/2020 The application has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present application has been filed for urgent hearing on the ground that the issue involved in the present petition is covered in petitioner’s favour by way of a judgment of this Court in Brand Equity Treaties Ltd. & Ors. vs. Union of India, [2020] 116 taxmann.com 415 (Delhi) ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jun 23, 2020)

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ramesh Chandra Shukla learned Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4. Against the order impugned, the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Section 107 of Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 before the appellate tribunal. The petition seeking for quashing of the order dated 5.5.2020 passed by the Joint Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax, Audit Commissionerate, K...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CGST DIVISION-G SIKAR vs. GANESH ENTERPRISES


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Jun 22, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Division-G, Sikar. (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) in view of Order-in-Review No. 01/Review/2019-20, dated 4-4-2019 passed by the Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Commissionerate, Alwar under Section 107(2) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, against the Order-in-Original No. 01/GST/2018, dated 25-9-2018 (hereinafter referred ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

R.K. MARBLES PVT. LTD.


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Jun 22, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by M/s. R.K. Marbles Private Limited, Makrana Road, Kishangarh, District-Ajmer-305801 (Rajasthan) (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against the Order-in-Original No. 01/Service Tax/2019-20 issued vide C. No. GL-4(3)IAR-597/17-18/RKM/KSG.L-II/2018/65, dated 30-4-2019 (hereinafter called as the “impugned order”) passed by the Superintendent, Central Goods & Se...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a proprietary concern through its proprietor, has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) Quash and set aside the show cause notice in Form GST DRC 01 dated 30.11.2019 at Annexure A to this petition. (b) declare the Rule 142(1)(a) of CGST/GGST Rules, being ultra vires and dehors the Act and violative of Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India, to the extent it says noti...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


8
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o Apr 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).