Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

1. The petitioner prays for a writ of mandamus declaring that the Assessment Order vide Ref. No. CGST/2017-18/05 dated 29-10-2018 for the tax period July, 2017 to February, 2018 passed by the respondent No. 1 levying GST on the value of broken rice, bran and husk obtained by the petitioner on milling of the paddy of the respondent No. 4 which were allowed to be retained by the petitioner in addition to the milling charges as compensation/exchange for the own rice supplied by the petitioner to...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. HEMANTH MOTORS vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA


(Karnataka High Court | Nov 20, 2020)

The petitioner has filed this petition for the following prayers: “[a] Declare the impugned provisions, viz, Section 129 of the KGST/CGST act, 2017 as null and void and ultra vires the Constitution of India and/or be pleased to strike down the said provisions as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14,19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. [b] Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned notice bearing No. JCCT (VIG)/CTOVID- 11/P-10/18-19 dated 07.01.2019 and Order da...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The appeal impugns the judgment of the learned Single Judge, which refused to interfere with Exhibit P4(a) & (b) order of detention and notice issued to the appellant under Section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ['CGST Act' for brevity]. The learned Single Judge directed release of the goods and vehicle on furnishing Bank Guarantee for the amount demanded in the impugned notice. 2. The appellant is a registered dealer in tiles. A consignment of ceramic ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. BHARATHIYAR UNIVERSITY


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Nov 19, 2020)

Note: Any appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pro...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAM PRASAD SHARMA vs. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER AND OTHER


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Nov 19, 2020)

Learned counsel for the rival parties are heard through video conferencing. 1. Instant petition invoking writ and supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution prays for following reliefs:- “(i) This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the record from the office of respondents for its kind perusal. (ii) That, a writ of certiorari or any other writ or writs may kindly be issued quashing the impugned order in Form GST DR...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AKASH GARG vs. STATE OF M.P.


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Nov 19, 2020)

Learned counsel for the rival parties are heard through video conferencing. 1. Instant petition invoking writ and supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution prays for following reliefs:- “(i) This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the record from the office of respondents for its kind perusal. (ii) That, a writ of certiorari or any other writ or writs may kindly be issued quashing the impugned order in Form GST DRC-07 ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr. Rahul Tangri, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.K. Gupta, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. The petitioner is a Private Limited Company engaged in the supply of patented and propriety medicines falling under Chapter 29 and 30 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, made applicable to the supplies made under the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (for short, the CGST Act). It has two Units in the State of Sikkim, one of which is located at Nandok Blo...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Learned counsel for the rival parties are heard through video conferencing. 1. Instant petition invoking writ and supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution prays for following reliefs:- “(i) This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the record from the office of respondents for its kind perusal. (ii) That, a writ of certiorari or any other writ or writs may kindly be issued quashing the impugned order in Form GST DRC-07 ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TABOOLA INDIA PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Nov 19, 2020)

The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order whereby the petitioner’s refund application of IGST for the period October to November 2017 has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impugned order has been passed in violation of principles of natural justice as no prior opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner. He further states that the impugned order is a non-reasoned ord...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TEXBOND NON-WOVENS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Puducherry | Nov 18, 2020)

Subject: GST Act,2017-Advance Ruling U/s 98 on Classification and rate of GST on PP Non-woven bags. We would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“CGST Act”) and the Puducherry Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“PGST Act”) are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)