Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,949 Results

RAMESH BHAIDAS SONWANE vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 5, 2021)

1 By way of this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the learned respondents to forthwith release truck number MH18BG3887. B. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropria...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting impugned order in Form GST MOV – 11 dated 10.6.2019 annexed at Annexure A issued by the learned respondent No.2. B. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UMA TRADING vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 5, 2021)

1 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) To issue a writ of mandamus and/or writ of certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to release the seized goods along with truck under Section 129(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 on such terms and conditions which may be deemed fit and proper to this Hon'ble Court and in th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KATARIA AUTOMOBILES PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 5, 2021)

1 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: "A. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing and setting aside impugned detention order dated 21.9.2019 (annexed at Annexure A). B. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SATYAKAM ARYA vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.


(Supreme Court | Mar 4, 2021)

1 Invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution, the petitioner has sought reliefs in the context of the GST Amnesty Scheme. To bring focus on the nature of the grievance, the reliefs which have been sought in these proceedings are extracted below: a. Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus to extend the GST Amnesty Scheme effected through its Notification bearing No. 52/2020 dated 24.05.2020 for two months. b. Issue a Writ, Order or D...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HYT SAM INDIA (JV)


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Mar 4, 2021)

Preamble 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017/Tamilnadu Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 (“the Act”, in Short), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a period of six...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CHENNAI METRO RAIL LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Mar 4, 2021)

Preamble 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017/Tamilnadu Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 (“the Act”, in Short), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a period of six...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

WESTERN ENTERPRISES vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 4, 2021)

1. By this Misc. Civil Application, the applicant – original petitioner has prayed for the following relief :- “A. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to clarify that the “bond” as mentioned in order dated 8.2.2021 is not required to be accompanied by bank guarantee/security and that the goods/vehicle are required to be released on the basis of challan and bond as submitted by the Applicant.” 2. While disposing of the main matter i.e. Special Civil Appl...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Since the issues raised in both the captioned writ applications are the same, those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. For the sake of convenience, the Special Civil Application No.12019 of 2019 is treated as the lead matter. 3. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorar...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Mr.S.Gurumoorthy, learned Senior Panel Counsel accepts notice for R1 and R2 and Mr.N.Nithiyanandan, learned counsel accepts notice for R3 to R5, and both learned counsel are armed with instructions to proceed in the matter. By consent expressed by both parties, this Writ Petition is disposed finally even at the stage of admission. 2. What is challenged is a communication dated 06.02.2021, whereunder the Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC) calls upon its Units/Officers to recover the amounts...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


30
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)