Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,949 Results

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) by M/s Durja Jewellers LLP, A-119, Shiv Shakti Nagar,Model Town, Jagatpur, Jaipur-302017 (hereinafter also referred to as the “appellant”) against the Order-in-Original No.ZP0811200148901 Dated 11.11.2020 (hereinafter as the “impugned order”) passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax Division-F, Jaipur (...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr.V.Sridharan, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr.S.P.Maharajan for the petitioner, Mr.G.Rajaraman, Central Government Standing Counsel for R1, the learned Government Advocate Mr.G.Arjunan for R2 and the learned counsel Mr.C.Godwin for the third and fourth respondents. 2.The petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and it is operating duty free shops in the various airports in India. The case on hand pertains to the duty free shop run by the petitioner...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Mr.ANR.Jayaprathap, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondent and is armed with instructions to proceed in the matter. Hence, by consent expressed by both parties, these Writ Petitions are disposed finally even at the stage of admission. 2. The challenge is to four orders of assessment, all dated 09.02.2021, for the periods 2017-18 to 2020-21, passed in terms of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (in short 'TNGST Act'). Admittedly, personal hearing ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KALIS SPARKLING WATER PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Mar 10, 2021)

Preamble 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017/Tamilnadu Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 (“the Act”, in Short), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a period of six...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ICU MEDICAL INDIA LLP


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Mar 10, 2021)

Preamble 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Central Goods 86 Services Tax Act 2017/Tamilnadu Goods & Services Tax Act 2017("the Act", in Short), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a period of six month...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
In all these writ petitions, the petitioners are registered dealers under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ['CGST Act, 2017' for brevity] and are seeking a direction to the respondents to permit them to file TRAN-1 statutory form either electronically or manually or for revising the form submitted earlier electronically or manually, extending the time limit prescribed under rule 117 of CGST Rules read with Section 140 of CGST Act, 2017 in order to carry forward the unutili...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

OLETY LANDMARK APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Mar 10, 2021)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THECGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 M/s Olety Landmark Apratment Owner's Assocation, (OLAOA) (called as the 'Applicant' hereafter) Flat No.9/1, Ground Floor, Pipeline Road, Kurubarahalli, Mahalalakshmipuram, Bengaluru-560086, having GSTIN 29AAAA09149D1ZE, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in f...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr. Dharam Gandhi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J. B. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks quashing of communication dated 09.11.2020 issued by the Assistant Commissioner (Anti-Evasion), CGST and Central Excise, Belapur Commissionerate i.e., respondent No.1 to the Branch Manager, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Fort Branch, Mumbai for provisional attachment of property under s...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

URC CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Odisha | Mar 9, 2021)

Subject: Ms. URC Construction Private Limited, Plot No. E-17, BJB Nagar, Ward BH-CI -Khordha, Bhubaneswar, 751014 Odisha, ( herein after referred to as the 'Applicant') having a GSTIN : 21AAACU2425Q1ZC, is a company filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 and Section 97 of the OGST Act, 2017 in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CGST Act and the SGST Act. 1.0 The Advance Ruling is sought on the question of applicabl...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PIONEER BAKERS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Odisha | Mar 9, 2021)

Subject: M/s Pioneer Bakers, AT-Sahayog Nagar, P.O. Budharaja, Dist- Sambalpur, Odisha, PIN-768003 (herein after referred to as the 'Applicant') having a GSTIN : 21AAQFP6408F1ZB, is a Partnership Firm filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 and Section 97 of the OGST Act, 2017 in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CGST Act and the SGST Act. 1.0 The Applicant having assigned with GSTIN number 21AAQFP6408F1ZB sou...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


30
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)