Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,064 Results

SREE KRISHNA RICE MILL


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jul 30, 2021)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or withi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jul 30, 2021)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by MAN Energy Solutions India Private Limited (Formerly known as MAN Diesel & Turbo India Private Limited),&n...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to debit a sum of ₹ 47,30,457/- form its electronic credit ledger. 2.The petitioner is the authorized signatory of the Hyundai Motor Group and was established in the year November, 2006 to provide engineering and construction services. The Department has blocked the petitioner's Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the tune of ₹ 47,30,457/-. The ITC is proposed to be reversed to the tune ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief/s :- a) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the  appellate order dated 11.02.2021 passed and issued vide memo number  163 by the respondent number 2 whereby rejection of appeal preferred  by the petitioner has been communicated for being in teeth of section  107 (12) of the Bihar Goods And Services Tax Act 2017; b) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the ord...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard Mr. P.A.S. Pati, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in both the cases. 2. Heard Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the original writ petitioner/opposite party no. 1 in the present cases. 3. These two civil review applications have been filed seeking review of the order dated 4th January, 2021 passed by this Court in W.P(T) No. 4061 of 2019. 4. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents of the writ petit...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The impugned orders dated 15.02.2021, passed under Section 73(4) and Section 74(1) of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the TNGST Act”) are sought to be quashed in the present writ petitions. 2.The petitioner is a manufacturer of TMT Rods, having their manufacturing premises at No.450, Lakshminaickenpalayam, Selakarachal Village, Coimbatore. From the year 2014, the petitioner was having severe financial difficulties due to sluggishness...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner, a ‘registered supplier’ under section 22 r/w section 26 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is grieving before the Writ Court as to non-consideration of his Revocation Applications dated 25.03.2021 & 26.04.2021 respectively at Annexures-F & G wherein he has sought for rescinding of “Order for cancellation of registration dated 23.07.2019”. 2. The learned Panel Counsel on Court’s request appearing for the respondents although in...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

B. ANANDAN vs. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA


(Madras High Court | Jul 29, 2021)

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 4.2.2021 for the offence punishable u/s 132(1)(d) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The petitioner is an Executive Director of M/s. Saraswathi Udyog India Ltd., which company is engaged in the supply of White Duplex Board. The allegation against the company is that it was making outward supplies without paying the taxes that are due to the Government. It ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CHANDAN KUMAR vs. STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHER


(Patna High Court | Jul 29, 2021)

(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon’ble the Chief Justice/Hon’ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): i) the notice dated 11.02.2020 (as contained in Annexure- 2 Series) issued by the respondent no.2 quantifying tax, interest and penalty amounting ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SACHIN GUPTA vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Jul 29, 2021)

1. Heard Sri Vipul Shukla and Sri Namman Raj Vanshi learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State. 2. This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Sachin Gupta, seeking anticipatory bail against the summoning order dated 26.03.2021, under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 issued by Mr Akash Deep, Superintendent/Sr. Intelligence Officer/Appraiser at Central Goods & Services Tax, Division I, Bareilly. 3. Put u...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


8
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o Apr 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).