Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,115 Results

Heard Adv. Latheesh Sebastian and Adv. Thanuja Roshan for parties. 2. Writ petitioner is the appellant. The appellant challenged Exts.P8 and P9 and also, prayed for a direction for expeditious consideration of representation made by the appellant before the expiry of time stipulated in Ext.P7 notification. The appellant has stated a few circumstances both for invoking the writ jurisdiction and also that, as on date, the appellant is not completely shut out from availing the window opened ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VISHAN GUPTA vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 27, 2021)

Heard Mr. Rahul Kashik, learned Advocate holding brief of Mr. Kaustubh Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Kuldeep Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the opposite party and perused the material available on record. By way of this application, the applicant has prayed for to enlarge him on bail in Misc. Case no. 101 of 2019, P.S. Sahibabad, District- Meerut, under Sections 132(1)(B) and 132(1)(i) Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the C...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PURANIK BUILDERS LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Aug 27, 2021)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been flied under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Puranik Builders Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions.- (a...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard. 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that summary of the tax liability was served in the month of September, 2019. Against that order the petitioner preferred an appeal on 27/12/2019. Thereafter, the petitioner was served with a show cause notice that the amount of 10% which is required to be deposited under Section 107(6)(b) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 in respect of quantum of amount has not been paid. It is contended that in response to such show cause notice...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GHODAWAT EDUSERVE LLP


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Aug 27, 2021)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application is filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. GHODAWAT EDUSERVE LLP, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. W...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAMBABU SINGH vs. STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS


(Patna High Court | Aug 26, 2021)

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): “i) the notice dated 03.02.2020 (as contained in in Annexure-1) issued by the respondent no.2 quantifying tax, interest and penalty amounting to र 9,39,808 under Section 74 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter called the BGST Act) for the period April 2019 to September 2019 be quashed. ii) the notice dated 03.02.2020 (as contained in Annexure-2) issued by the respondent no.2 quantifying tax, interest and ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAMBABU SINGH vs. STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS


(Patna High Court | Aug 26, 2021)

(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon’ble the Chief Justice/Hon’ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): “i) the notice dated 03.02.2020 (as contained in in Annexure-1) issued by the respondent no.2 quantifying tax, interest and penalty amountin...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VISHAL GUPTA vs. STATE OF U.P


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 25, 2021)

1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Shiv Kumar Pal, learned Government Advocate, Sri Rishi Chaddha, Sri A.K. Sand and Sri Patanjali Mishra, learned A.G.As. for the State-respondents.   2. On 13.08.2021 and 24.08.2021, this court passed the following orders:-   “Order Dated 13.08.2021   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NITISH SINGHAL vs. STATE OF HARYANA


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Aug 25, 2021)

CRM-12760-2021 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and photographs of the present residential house of the petitioner and copy of sale deed are taken on record as Annexures P-6 and P-7 respectively. CRM-16089-2021 The application filed on 27.05.2021 for pre-ponement of the petition has become infructuous and the same is disposed of accordingly. CRM-M-31101-2020 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 439 of the Code of Crim...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JIT AUTO COMP. vs. STATE TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS


(Madras High Court | Aug 25, 2021)

This common order will dispose of both the captioned writ petitions. 2. 'W.P.No.1914 of 2021' shall be referred to as 'I writ petition' and 'W.P.No.17524 of 2021' shall be referred to as 'II writ petition', both for the sake of convenience and clarity. 3. Mr.M.D.Thirunavukkarasu, learned counsel for writ petitioner in both I and II writ petitions, Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Government Advocate for first respondent in I writ petition, Mr.R.Gunalan, learne...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


12
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).