Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,135 Results

PIONEER ASSOCIATES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Sep 30, 2021)

A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furthe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KANAHIYA REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Sep 30, 2021)

A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furthe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MASTERLY KOLKATA FACILITY MAINTENANCE PVT LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Sep 30, 2021)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or withi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ALUDECOR LAMINATION PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Sep 30, 2021)

(Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. ALUDECOR LAMINATION PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. Wheth...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VINOD KUMAR vs. COMMISSIONER UTTARAKHAND STATE AND OTHERS


(Uttarakhand High Court | Sep 30, 2021)

A very intricate question, which has been raised by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, in the present writ petition is emanating from the impugned orders, which have been passed by the Competent Authorities under the Uttarakhand Goods and Service Tax, Act of 2017, whereby by an order of 21.09.2019, which has been passed by the Assistant Commissioner, GST, he had cancelled the registration of the petitioner, which was bearing GST Registration No. GSTIN 05AGMPK8182B3ZC”, which...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VINITA GUPTA vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHER


(Patna High Court | Sep 30, 2021)

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- “1(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or directions(s) in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order cum demand notice dated 11.01.2021 (Annexure- 3) passed by the respondent Assistant Commissioner of State Tax under Section 74 of the Bihar Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as ‘the BGST Act, 2017 only) read with Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (herein after re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM APPL. 34374/2021 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11165/2021n & CM APPL. 34373/2021 Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 13th September, 2021 passed by the Commissioner, CGST & CX, Delhi East whereby the bank accounts (No. 072105000934 maintained at ICICI Bank Ltd, New Delhi, No. 50200007530441 maintained at HDFC Bank Ltd, New Delhi and No.916020029282287 maintained at ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LUCKNOW PRODUCERS COOPRATIVE MILK UNION LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Sep 29, 2021)

The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Uttar Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and UPGST Act”) by M/s. Lucknow Producers Cooprative Milk Union Ltd, 22, Jopling Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the “Appellant”) against the Advance Ruling Order No. UP ADRG 76/2021 dated 16.04.2021 issued by the Authority for Advance Ruling, Utt...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has sought for issuance of appropriate writ to declare the collection of tax, penalty and cess by the respondent to be in violation of the provisions of CGST Act, 2017, KGST Act, 2017 and Circular No.41/15/2018-GST dated 13.04.2018. Further relief is sought for issuance of writ of certiorari to quash GST DRC-07 dated 15.07.2020 and for issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to refund the tax, penalty and cess amounting to ₹ 18,13,254/- collected from the petiti...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GNC INFRA LLP vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER


(Madras High Court | Sep 28, 2021)

This common order will govern both the captioned writ petitions and 'Writ Miscellaneous Petitions' ('WMPs' in plural and 'WMP' in singular for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity). 2. Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made in the previous listing on 01.09.2021 and 03.09.2021, which read as follows: 'Proceedings made on 01.09.2021: Subject matter of captioned writ petitions pertains to refund under 'The...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


13
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).