Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,135 Results

DADAJI HOSPITALS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Oct 6, 2021)

1. M/s. Dadaji Hospitals Private Limited, 932, Plot No.64/1 Opposite Chanchalla Bai College, Cole Bazar, Jabalpur(MP) 482001 (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant) is multispecialty Hospital. equipped with latest infrastructure and competent medical staff. The Applicant is having a GST registration with GSTIN 23AAGCD0903Q1ZO. 2. The provisions of the CGST Act and MPGST Act are identical, except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a specific mention of the dissimilar pr...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DHANRAJ ORGANICS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Oct 6, 2021)

1. The present application has been tiled u/s 97 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 and MP Goods and services Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to CGST Act and SGST Act respectively) by M/s Dhanraj Organics Private Limited plant located at Plot No. 31, Sector II, Pithampur (M.P) (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant), registered under the Goods & Services Tax and GST number is 23AAACD5735C1Z7. 2. The provisions of the CGST Act and MPGST Act are identical, except for ce...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GULAB SINGH CHAUHAN


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Oct 6, 2021)

1. GULAB SINGH CHAUHAN (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant) is proposed to open a new business venture of PAN SHOP. Shop is located at Vijay nagar. Scheme no. 54 in the Indore district of the state of Madhya Pradesh (452001). The Applicant is having a GST registration with GSTIN 23AAYPC2644L1ZG. 2. The provisions of the CGST Act and MPGST Act are identical, except for certain provisions. Therefore. unless a specific mention of the dissimilar provision is made, a reference to the CGS...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Since the issue raised in these Writ Petitions is one and the same, with consent of both sides, these writ petitions were heard together and are decided by this common order. 2. The petitioner has been registered with Nagarkoil -2 Assessment Circle of the respondent Department holding GSTIN.33AAOFP8263A1Z9 and the petitioner has been regularly filing monthly returns under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as the “Act” in short]. 3.&...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents. 2. The Show-cause notice under Section 74 of the JGST Act, 2017 dated 7th June 2021 for the tax period July 2020 - September 2020 (Annexure-1) issued by the Deputy Commissioner of State Taxes (respondent no.3) has been challenged by the petitioner along with the consequential challenge to summary of show-cause notice in FORM DRC-01 dated 07th June 2021 (Annexure-2) issued in exercise of power under Rule 142(1)(a) of the Jharkha...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BRIGHT STEELS vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER


(Madras High Court | Oct 6, 2021)

Challenging the common order passed in W.P(MD)Nos.14395, 14396, 14397 & 14398 of 2021, dated 13.08.2021, the petitioner in the Writ Petitions have filed the above Writ Appeals. 2. The appellant filed the Writ Petitions to issue Writs of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent, dated 05.02.2021 in respect of the assessment orders and to quash the same. 3. The only contention of the appellant is that they were not given an opportunity of personal hearing, which is mand...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard Sri Nishant Mishra along with Sri Nikhil Gupta and Ms Vedika Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Krishna Ji Shukla, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 5 and Sri Manu Ghildyal, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 6. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking a mandamus to respondent no.6 to refund to the petitioner ₹ 1,28,50,535/- that became due to the petitioner under the order dated 06.01.2020 passed by respondent no.6. That amount of refund relates to...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TEMPLE PACKAGING PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Daman Diu and DNH | Oct 5, 2021)

The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 (1) of the Union Territory Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 /Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 (hereinafter referred to the Act') by M/s. Temple Packaging Pvt. Ltd., (herein after referred to as the appellant” for the sake of brevity) The appeal is filed against the Order No.01/Daman/2019-20-AR dated 18.07.2019 passed by the Union Territory Authority for Advance ruling on the application for advance ruling filed ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JENEFA INDIA vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Madras High Court | Oct 5, 2021)

Since the issue raised in these writ petitions is one and the same, with the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for both sides, all these writ petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Since the facts are similar in all these cases, for the sake of convenience and for easy reference, the facts in respect of the case in W.P.(MD)No.16770 of 2019, is traversed hereunder: 1.1. That the petitioner is a manufacturer of fish meal. The fish meal produced ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VISHAL GUPTA vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Oct 5, 2021)

Heard Sri Anurag Khanna, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Nipun Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari, Sri Dileep Chandra Mathur, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The petitioner has made the following prayer: (1) issue an order or direction to call for the records and set aside the impugned order dated 16.09.2021 passed by the learned Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut in Case No. 48...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


14
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).