Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

V.M. TIMBER INDUSTRIES vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Apr 4, 2025)

JUDGMENT SANJEEV KUMAR 1. The petitioner is an industrial unit engaged in the production and supply of cement to various manufacturers and customers across the country. The petitioner is aggrieved of the refund orders dated 11th July, 2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, CGST Division, Samba [‘respondent No. 3’] in terms of notification No. F.No.(1)2017-DBA-II/NER dated 05.10.2017 and has challenged the same primarily on the ground that the rejection of refund claims by...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AQUA POLYMERS vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Apr 4, 2025)

JUDGMENT SANJEEV KUMAR 1. The petitioner is an industrial unit engaged in the production and supply of Blow Molding Water Tanks to various manufacturers and customers across the country. The petitioner is aggrieved of the refund orders dated 1st April, 2022 and 20th June, 2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, CGST Division, Samba [‘respondent No. 3’] in terms of notification No. F.No. 10(1)2017-DBA-II/NER dated 05.10.2017 and has challenged the same primarily on the grou...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CAV ORDER 1. By the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the demand order dated 11.01.2021 along with Form DRC-07 dated 15.01.2021 issued by respondent No. 3, wherein it has been stated that the demand order came to the knowledge of the petitioner pursuant to the issuance of recovery notice dated 27.02.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the impugned order has been issued without issuing a show cause notice u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Service T...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CAV ORDER 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 08.04.2024 passed by the Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Raipur Division 01, Civil Lines, Raipur (CG) whereby confirming the tax demand of INR 42,73,78,516/- and levying interest of INR 46,15,68,818/- and penalty of INR 4,27,37,852/-. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the Petitioner is a bulk supplier of a wide range of coal and is engaged in catering to the diversified needs of various industrial sectors th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

J&K CEMENT CORPORATION vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Apr 4, 2025)

JUDGMENT SANJEEV KUMAR 1. The petitioner is an industrial unit engaged in the production and supply of cement to various manufacturers and customers across the country. The petitioner is aggrieved of the refund order dated 20th June, 2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, CGST Division, Samba [‘respondent No. 3’] in terms of notification No. F.No. 10(1)2017-DBA-II/NER dated 05.10.2017 and has challenged the same primarily on the ground that the rejection of refund claim b...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHIVA INDUSTRIES vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Apr 4, 2025)

JUDGMENT Sanjeev Kumar “J” 1. The petitioner is an industrial unit engaged in the production and supply of cement to various manufacturers and customers across the country. The petitioner is aggrieved of the refund orders dated 22nd April, 2022 and 23rd June, 2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, CGST Division, Samba [“respondent No.3”] in terms of notification No.F.No.10(1)2017-DBA-II/NER dated 05.10.2017 and has challenged the same primarily on the ground t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GUPTA TRADERS & OTHERS vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Apr 4, 2025)

ORDER 1. Heard. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioners have challenged ex-parte demand order and show cause notice dated 28.12.2023 and 11.07.2023, respectively, relating to the assessment year 2017-18 issued by the Deputy Commissioner Jurisdiction Barabanki Sector -4, Ayodhya (B): Ayodhya: Uttar Pradesh under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. 3. This subject matter is covered by the judgment and order dated 06.02.2025 rendered in W...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P. C. 1. Although the above Writ Petition is shown under the caption “For Ad-Interim Reliefs”, with the consent of parties, we have heard it finally. Hence, we issue Rule. The Respondents waive service. With the consent of parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard finally. 2. The Petitioner had filed the above Writ Petition challenging the Refund Rejection Order dated 01.06.2023 passed by Respondent No. 2 and a direction to Respondent No. 2 to forthwith grant re...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Learned advocate Mr. Parth Shah for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Shrunjal Shah for the respondents. 2. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Appellate Authority, whereby, the order of cancellation of registration passed by the Assessing Officer has been upheld and the appeal was dismissed on the ground of limitation. 3. The petitioner challenged the order of cancellation ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

FOREST CONTRACTOR vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Karnataka High Court | Apr 3, 2025)

ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: "i) Issue a writ of certiorari, or Writ of Certiorari quashing the impugned adjudication passed by the respondent No. 3 bearing No.MA290324073362X dated 18.03.2024 at Annexure-E for the assessment year 2018-19 in so far as the petitioner is concerned. ii) Issue a writ of certiorari, or writ of certiorari quashing the impugned issued by respondent No. 3 bearing No: JCCT(VIG)/ACCT/(VIG)-02/INS1446/202...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)