Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

Petitioner has sought for issuance of writ of certiorari to quash the show cause notice at Annexure-A and has also sought for issuance of writ of certiorari to quash the order for cancellation of Registration at Annexure-B and the endorsement at Annexure-E. 2. Petitioner submits that he was not personally heard in the proceedings leading to passing of the order at Annexure- B. It is contended that the show cause notice at Annexure-A does not fix any specific date for availing the opportun...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GRB DAIRY FOODS PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Feb 23, 2022)

The subject appeal has been filed under Section 100 (1) of the Tamilnadu Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017/Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 by M/s. GRB DAIRY FOODS PVT. LTD, (herein after referred as the Appellant), having their registered office at No.10 Sidco Shed Sipcot Industrial Complex, Hosur, Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu-635126. The appellant are registered under GST with GSTIN 33AACCG0136G1Z8. They are engaged in the business of manufacture and supply of ghee and other p...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PSK ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION & CO.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Feb 23, 2022)

The subject appeal is filed under Section 100(1) of the Tamilnadu Goods & Services Tax Act 2017/Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 (hereinafter referred to ‘the Act’) by PSK Engineering Construction & co. (hereinafter referred to as ‘Appellant’). The appellant is registered under GST vide GSTIN 33AAGFP24B3EIZF. The appeal is filed against the Order No.08/ARA/2021 dated 25.03.2021 passed by the Tamilnadu State Authority for Advance ruling on the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NEW NALBANDH TRADERS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 23, 2022)

1. Having regard to the facts of the present litigation and also considering the present day scenario of the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax, Act, 2017, the following observations by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Pannalal Binjraj vs. Union of India, AIR 1957 SC 397 are apt: “A humane and considerate administration of the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act would go a long way in allaying the apprehensions of the assessees and...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAMA DEVI GUTTIKONDA (SPANSULES FORMULATIONS)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 23, 2022)

1. Applicant Smt. Rama Devi Guttikonda and trade name M/s. Spansules Formulations, Plot No. 154 A/4, SVCIE Industrial Estate, IDA Bollaram, Jinnaram MandaL, Medchal - Malkajgiri, Telangana- 502325 (36AFTPG0523Q2ZZ) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This intra-court appeal is filed by the appellants, aggrieved by the order dated 07.04.2021 passed in WP No. 5192 of 2020. By the said order dated 07.4.2021, the learned Judge directed the appellants to refund the sum of ₹ 2 crores, collected from the writ petitioner/first respondent herein towards Goods and Service Tax due, within a period of four weeks. 2. The first respondent in this appeal has filed the above said Writ Petition No. 5192 of 2020 praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, r...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has challenged the impugned tender cum auction notice, dated 25.01.2018, insofar as the same demands GST from the petitioner on the tender bid and other successful bidders. 2. It is the specific case of the petitioner that he participated in the tender in connection with Masi Perunthiruvizha in the 4th respondent Temple between 15.02.2018 and 06.03.2018. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that auction was held on 06.02.2018 and in connection with the afor...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal. 2. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:- “11(a) be pleased to issue a writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records pertaining to the petitioner’s case...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties and considering the submission of both the parties who agreed that the issues involved in this writ petition are covered by the judgment of the Appeal Court dated 14th December, 2021 passed in MAT 552 of 2020 (Nodal Officer, Jt. Commissioner, IT Grievance, GST Bhawan Vs. M/s. Das Auto Centre), this writ petition is disposed of by the order as hereunder:- In this writ petition, petitioner is making prayer for relief/direction upon the respo...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The prayer sought for herein is for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the respondents, to quash the impugned notice, dated 20.01.2022 issued by the third respondent, i.e., The Assistant Commissioner / Adjudication, Intelligence - II and direct the second respondent to release the conveyance bearing No. TN28AF5779 and its goods which was detained by him in order, dated 19.01.2022. 2. The petitioner goods which are chemical carried by the conveyance w...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).