Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,275 Results

PULKIT vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)


(Delhi High Court | Apr 12, 2022)

The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through hybrid mode [physical and virtual hearing]. 1. The applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 263/2018 dated 24.12.2018 registered at Police Station Economic Offences Wing for offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”]. 2. The FIR was registered on 24.12.2018, originally in respect of offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of the IPC, and the only accused named in ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DISHU JAIN vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Apr 12, 2022)

Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sudarshan Singh, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 1/Union of India and opposite party no.2/C.G.S.T. Department, Meerut and perused the record. The anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant against the summoning order dated 02.11.2021 issued by Superintendent, Central GST Commissionerate, Meerut U/s 70 & 132(1)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017, Police Station Centr...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This intra-Court appeal is directed against the order dated 2-12-2021 passed by the Learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 21882/2021 whereby the Learned Single Judge has followed the Division Bench decision of this Court in the case of Union of India v. Asiad Paints Limited and Others reported in 2021 (49) G.S.T.L. 256 and thereby permitted the respondent-assessee to file once again rectified TRAN-I Form electronically or manually within a period of 30 days from the date of the order. 2. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioners during enquiry in connect on with the case in GST 3333BGIPD 2160D1Z3 of AKM Traders. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the 2nd petitioner is a Proprietrix of M/s.AKM Traders, having administrative office at No.29, Maruthi Nagar, Chinnakangarakuppam, Cuddalore, involved in trading of steels and allied products. The 1st petitioner is the husband of th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AS BHARAT REFINERY (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | Apr 11, 2022)

1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 and Uttarakhand State Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST/SGST Act) and the rules made there under filed by M/s AS Bharat Refinery (India) Private Limited, F-01, Prakash City, Bajpur Road, Kashipur, Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand- 244713 (herein after referred to as the “applicant”), a private limited company incorporated under the Companies...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has filed this writ petition for a Mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to receive the tax due of Rs.6,45,414/- (till Nov-21) and Rs.2,81,000/- (up to date for December 2021 approximately) in respect of GSTIN No. 33AAACG6670M1ZE without penalty by providing an user ID and password temporarily, so that the petitioner can file GST-R1 and GST-R3B returns regularly along with his future taxes based on the communication dated 15.02.2021 by the 1st respondent. 2.The writ petitio...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents nos.1 and 3 respectively. 2. The respondent no.2 – Mr. Sandeep Mahendrabhai Patel, State Tax Officer, Ghatak-1, Ahmedabad, Range-1, Division-1, Gujarat has been impleaded in his personal capacity as the writapplicant feels that he has acted in a very high-handed manner. If any Officer has been impleaded in his personal capacity, we don’t expec...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAHUL AGARWAL vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Allahabad High Court | Apr 11, 2022)

Heard Mrs. Pragya Pandey, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. D.C. Mathur, learned counsel representing opposite party. Perused the record. This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant- Rahul Agarwal in connection with Case No. DGGI/ARU/Gr.B/A.Raaj/10/2021/519 dated 22.07.2021 under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Mrs. Pragya Pandey, learned counsel for applicant contends that only allegation against the applicant is that the sal...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SANJOY SINGH vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Apr 11, 2022)

This is an application challenging an order dated 20.07.2021 passed by the Joint Commissioner of Revenue, Bureau of Investigation being the respondent no.4 under Section 74 of the WBGST Act. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. By the impugned order, the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed on the ground that the certified copy of the impugned order challenged th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
WA No.177 of 2022, WA. No.178 of 2022 and WA No.181 of 2022 are filed against the judgment in WP(C) Nos.20455 of 2021, No.20453 of 2021 and WP(C) No.20447 of 2021 respectively. Since a common question arose in all the three Writ Petitions, the learned Single Judge passed a common judgment. The main issue that raised was regarding the grant of copy of statements recorded by the respondents in the course of investigation and non collection of tax for outward supply of rice. 2. The appellant...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


22
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).