Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,382 Results

GKV SHARMA vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHER


(Orissa High Court | Aug 1, 2022)

ORDER 1. This matter is taken up through virtual/physical mode. 2. The Petitioner has challenged the communication dated 29th April, 2022 indicating non-payment of interest, late fee, penalty and in-eligible credit of Input Tax Credit for the period from July 2017 to January 2021 by way of writ petition filed before this Court invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India for indulgence. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioner that against the order of cancell....
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
W.P.(C)No.31710 of 2021 & I.A.No.14596 of 2021 1. This matter is taken up through virtual/physical mode. 2. Challenging the appellate order dated 12th May, 2021 passed under Section 107 of the Odisha Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, ‘the OGST Act, 2017’) in Appeal Case No.AD211220005356X and the order dated 15th July, 2021 passed on the application for rectification being made under Section 116 of the said Act by the Additional Commissioner of State Tax (....
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER In the facts and circumstances of the case, no interference of this Court is called for. Let the third refund application submitted by the respondent be considered in accordance with law and on its own merits. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Pending application stands disposed of. ....
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHARAT KASHYAP AND OTHERS vs. L&T PAREL PROJECT LLP AND OTHERS


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 29, 2022)

ORDER The present Report dated 29.10.2020, has been furnished by the Applicant No. 02 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 09.10.2019 to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an application filed under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, ....
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NITESH KUMAR SINGHAL AND OTHER vs. SSBC REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 29, 2022)

The present Report dated 30.12.2020, has been furnished by the Applicant No. 03 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 03.12.2019 to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of applications filed under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 by the Applicant No. 1 and ....
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NILANG SHASTRI AND OTHERS vs. SWATI REALTY


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 29, 2022)

ORDER 1. The Present Report dated 27.11.2020 had been furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules. 2017. The brief facts of the present case was that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering on 17.07.2020 to the DGAP for conducting a detailed investigation in respect of an application filed by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering by the ....
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Petitioner is registered under the provisions of Goods and Service Tax. It availed transitional credit through TRAN-1. The same was uploaded on the web portal of Central Board of Indirect Tax and customs. However, a mistake was committed while uploading the necessary details. The petitioner has sought to rectify the same. However, in the meanwhile the filing under the web portal was closed because of which the error could not be rectified. Hence, the instant writ petition is filed. ....
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GOKULRAM SHANMUGAM KANTHARAJAN (M/S. JAY KAY TRANS..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jul 29, 2022)

Note: Any appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pro....
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KUMARAN MEDICAL CENTRE


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jul 29, 2022)

Note: Any appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pro....
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KAMARAJAR PORT LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jul 29, 2022)

Note: Any appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pro....
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
2
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o May 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o May 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o May 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o May 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o May 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o May 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o May 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o May 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Jun

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for May 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o May 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).