Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,527 Results

SUGUNA AUTOMOBILES vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER


(Madras High Court | Dec 12, 2022)

Short Summary:
The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, primarily on two grounds: the absence of a prior Show Cause Notice and alle..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court dismissed the petition seeking release of seized computers, laptops, documents, and other items obtained during a GST investigation into fraudulent input tax credit claims and bogus firms. I..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRIRAM PISTONS AND RINGS LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Dec 9, 2022)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER SECTION 98 (4) OF THE UPGST ACT, 2017 1. M/s SHRIRAM PISTONS AND RINGS LIMITED, A-4 to A-7, B-8/1 & 2, B 9 & 10, Industrial Area III, Meerut Road, Ghaziabad- 201 003 (U.P.) (herein after referred to as the applicant) is a registered assessee under GST having GSTIN: 09AAACS0229G1ZN. 2. The applicant has submitted an application for Advance Ruling dated 14.10.2022 enclosing dully filled Form ARA-01 (the application form....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CALL ME SERVICES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Chhatisgarh | Dec 9, 2022)

PROCEEDINGS [U/s 98 of the Chhattisgarh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (herein-after referred to as CGGST Act, 2017)] M/s Call Me Services, C-101/5, First floor, Tagore Nagar, Raipur-492001, Chhattisgarh(here in after referred to as the applicant) holding GSTIN-22ADEPB9688C1ZQ, has furnished and application dated 3.9.2022 in form ARA-01 under section 97 of the Chhattisgarh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 seeking advance ruling regarding GST exemption on the services provided in....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CEMENT HOUSE vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Patna High Court | Dec 9, 2022)

Short Summary:
The court quashed and set aside the ex parte tax assessment and demand orders for the financial year 2019-20 due to violation of natural justice principles, notably the absence of a fair hearing and i..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VARSHAN ENTERPRISES vs. OFFICE OF THE GST COUNCIL


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | Dec 9, 2022)

Short Summary:
The court granted relief to the petitioner who had inadvertently misstated the recipient’s GSTIN while filing GST returns, resulting in a misdirected IGST payment that the actual recipient could not..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LAKKAD BROTHERS AND CO. vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 9, 2022)

Short Summary:
The court quashed and set aside both the show-cause notice proposing cancellation of registration and the subsequent cancellation order, finding them vague and lacking specific reasons or supporting d..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court quashed and set aside the impugned ex parte orders passed by the tax authorities, finding them violative of natural justice due to denial of fair hearing and lack of reasoned adjudication. T..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHREE RAM CONSTRUCTION vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Dec 9, 2022)

Short Summary:
The court held that the issuance of a cryptic show cause notice and an equally cryptic order violated the principle of natural justice, as they failed to provide adequate reasons or opportunity to the..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court quashed the impugned ex-parte assessment order and related demand notice issued without affording the mandatory statutory 30-day notice period under Section 74(A) of the CGST Act, 2017. Sinc..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
14
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o May 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o May 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Jun

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for May 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o May 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).