Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,644 Results

SITA PANDEY vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR & OTHERS


(Patna High Court | Aug 23, 2023)

Short Summary:
The court held that the tax authority’s recovery of the entire assessed tax, interest, and penalty from the assessee’s bank accounts immediately after dismissal of the first appeal was arbitrary, ..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court dismissed the petition seeking a writ of mandamus to prevent the petitioner’s arrest under Section 70 of the Central GST Act, 2017, holding that no protection can be granted at the summons..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SURENDRA BAHADUR SINGH vs. STATE OF U.P.


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 23, 2023)

Short Summary:
The court set aside the cancellation order of the petitioner's GST registration dated 07.01.2023, finding it to lack any application of mind and hence violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. Alth..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MANOJ STEEL TRADERS vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 23, 2023)

Short Summary:
The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of an appeal on the ground of limitation. The key issue was whether the limitation period for filing the appeal started from the date th..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SPARSH CHOWDHARY & OTHERS vs. PEARLITE REAL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Aug 22, 2023)

ORDER 1. The Present Report dated 28.03.2022 had been received by the erstwhile National Anti-profiteering Authority (hereinafter referred to as “NAA”) from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (hereinafter referred to as “DGAP”) after investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. 2. The DGAP vide the above said Report dated 28.03.2022 had inter-alia stated the following: - i. The Applicant No. 1 alleged th....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING & OTHERS vs. FRIENDS LAND DEVELOPERS


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Aug 22, 2023)

ORDER 1. The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) vide Interim Order No. 15/2022 dated 31.08.2022 in this matter had passed the following order:- i. The Respondent vide his submissions has contended that the DGAP has not incorporated the ITC of VAT in the pre-GST period for the computation of profiteering which ought to have been done. He has further submitted before this Authority that the said ITC on VAT credit was Rs. 7,89,028/- for the period from April 2016 to Jun....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BAJRANG BUILDING MATERIAL vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 22, 2023)

Short Summary:
The court set aside the assessment order imposing a tax demand exceeding Rs. 42 lakhs, holding that the authority erred by not granting the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing before passing..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court allowed the petition challenging the seizure of over Rs. 50 lakh in cash under the Central GST Act, holding that the authorities lacked power to seize unaccounted cash under Section 67(2), a..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KRISHNA IMPEX vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF GST


(Madras High Court | Aug 22, 2023)

Short Summary:
The court addressed a writ petition seeking a directive to allow the petitioner to debit a specified sum from its electronic credit ledger. The respondents stated that the credit had been blocked by a..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DIGINX TRADER vs. STATE OF U.P.


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 22, 2023)

Short Summary:
The court set aside the penalty order imposing a fine under Section 129(1)(b) of the GST Act, finding that the petitioner was wrongly held not to be the owner of the goods in transit. As the goods wer..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
26
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o May 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).