Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Mar 3, 2025)

ORDER 1. Impugned in this petition filed by the petitioner-Bank is a show-cause notice issued by the Commissioner Central Goods and Services Tax, Jammu dated 30.11.2024 whereby, the petitioner-Bank has been called upon to show cause as to why an action may not be taken against it under the provision of Jammu and Kashmir GST Act, 2017 or the rules made thereunder or any other law for the time being in force. 2. From a plain reading of the show-cause notice, we find that the Commissione...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER CM APPL. 12596/2025 ( Ex. ) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2653/2025 & CM APPL. 12595/2025 (Stay) 1. The writ petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:- “(a) Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing of the impugned order dated 19.03.2024 passed by the learned GSTO, Ward 13 & 15; (b) Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of cert...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JL ENTERPRISES vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER & OTHER


(Calcutta High Court | Mar 3, 2025)

ORDER 1. Questioning the provisional order of attachment issued under Section 83 of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), dated 13th April, 2023 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, the instant writ petition has been filed. 2. Mr. Shraff, learned advocate appearing in support of the writ petition by drawing attention of this Court to the provisions contained in Section 83 of the said Act would submit that a power has been conferred on the au...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Both the writ petitions arise out of the same orders, as such are being decided by means of this common order. 2. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and Sri Dipak Seth with Sri A. K. Jain who appears for the respondents. 3. Both the petitions have been filed challenging the order dated 21.11.2024 passed by the respondent no.2 in case of both the petitioners whereby a demand has been confirmed under section 74 of the GST Act and a demand...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P.C. 1. Mentioned. Taken out of turn. 2. The above Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned Garnishee Notice in Form DRC-13 dated 14th February 2025 issued by the State Tax Officer, Thane Division, Thane (Respondent No. 3) instructing Respondent No. 4 Bank to pay over a sum of Rs. 2,18,77,406/- to the Government for the tax payable by the Petitioner under the GST Act. A challenge is also laid to the impugned order dated 13th August 2024 issued by Respondent No. 3 demanding the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P. C. 1. The above Writ Petition challenges the Notification No. 9/2023-Central Tax dated 31st March, 2023 and Notification No. 56/ 2023-Central Tax dated 28th December, 2023 issued by respondent No. 6 (Union of India) and Notification No. 9/2023-State Tax dated 24th May, 2023 and Notification No. 56/2023 dated 16th January, 2024 issued by Respondent No. 1 (State of Maharashtra) exercising powers under Section 168A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act). Consequently, t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Mr. Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Similar controversy is involved in all the writ petitions, therefore, with the consent of the parties, all the aforesaid writ petitions are being decided by a common judgement treating Writ Tax No. 1022 of 2021, as leading case. Writ Tax No. 1022 of 2021 3. By ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GAUTAM GARG vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Supreme Court | Feb 28, 2025)

ORDER Leave granted. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 03.12.2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur in S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 168 of 2023. The appellant herein has been booked for the crime registered pursuant to Case No. DGGI/INV/GST/3480/2023-Gr.H-C-0/F DG-DGGI-ZU- Jaipur dated 25.10.2023 with respect to offence punishable under Section 132(1)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for sho...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

YASHASWI SKILLS LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Feb 28, 2025)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. YASHASWI SKILLS LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KUNTHUNATH TRADING & INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Feb 28, 2025)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. KUNTHUNATH TRADING & INVESTMENTS PVT LTD, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the follo...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)