Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

ORDER An order in original dated 14.07.2023 is challenged in this writ petition on the ground that the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. By asserting that the petitioner was unaware of the show cause notice or the order in original because the same were uploaded on the GST portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode, the present writ petition was filed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An assessment order dated 25.10.2023 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned order because the show cause notice and other communications were uploaded on the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode. 3. Learned couns...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MOON LABELS vs. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Madras High Court | Jun 11, 2024)

ORDER In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 27.12.2023 passed by the fourth respondent for the Assessment Year 2017-2018 and also the impugned Notification No. 09/2023-Central Tax, dated 31.03.2023 issued by the first respondent. 2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner has given up the prayer for quashing the impugned Notification No.09/2023-Central Tax, dated 31.03.2023 issued by the first respondent. 3. The dispute has ari...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order dated 28.12.2023 rejecting the petitioner's request for refund is challenged in this writ petition. Pursuant to an audit, observations were communicated to the petitioner. One of the observations pertained to the petitioner having wrongly claimed Input Tax Credit (ITC) in respect of CGST and SGST instead of IGST. Upon being informed of the above, the petitioner paid sums of Rs. 4,91,390/- and Rs. 4,59,000/- in Form GST DRC 03 dated 13.06.2023. A claim for refund was mad...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner has challenged the impugned order passed by the first respondent in A.No.21/2022-GST, dated 17.08.2022. 2. By the impugned order, the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order of the second respondent in Order-in-Original No.OIO.No. 02/2021-GST in GEXCOM/ADJN/GST/374/2021 O-CGST-DVN-TTN dated 31.12.2021 (Corrigendum dated 24.03.2022 in GEXCOM/ADJN/GST/374/2021 O-GST-DVN-TTN) has been rejected. 3. By the aforesaid Order-in-Original No.OIO.No.02/2021-GST ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

METGUD TILES vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & OTHERS


(Karnataka High Court | Jun 10, 2024)

ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the respondents No.1, 4 and 7, learned counsel Sri Avinash Angadi, appearing for respondents No.2 and 3 as well as Sri Shivaraj S. Balloli appearing for respondent No.3. 2. This petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the validity of the impugned order in Appeal bearing No.GST-15/22-23, dated 23.05.2023 passed by respondent No.5 under Section 107(11) of the Karnataka Goods and Services Act, 2017. The petitioner...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AMRITA & CO. vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHENNAI


(Madras High Court | Jun 10, 2024)

ORDER An order in original dated 15.12.2023 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. By asserting that the petitioner had entrusted GST compliances to an auditor and that the petitioner was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned assessment order, the present writ petition was filed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the tax proposal pertains to a mismatch between the petitioner...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner assails a rejection order dated 24.11.2022 for assessment period 2019-20. The petitioner had entered into an agreement for development / sale with KG Foundation Private Limited (KG Foundation). Under the said agreement, the property was to be developed by KG Foundation. In relation thereto, the petitioner states that KG Foundation collected GST at 18% in relation to the construction activities. On the basis that GST should have been collected at 5% and not at 18%, the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 16.06.2023 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner asserts that it was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned order because GST compliances were entrusted to an Accountant who abruptly left the services of the company. It is further stated that the petitioner became aware of proceedings only upon recovery proceedings being initiated. 2. Learn...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An assessment order dated 21.11.2023 is challenged on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. 2. The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned assessment order because the show cause notice and impugned order were uploaded on the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal, but not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner referred to the impug...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)