Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. Already by an order dated 07.06.2024 in W.P(MD).No.11955 of 2024 for the assessment year of 2019-20, liberty was given to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Commissioner, subject to the condition that the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax. 3. The present disputes pertaining to the assessment year 2022-23. 4. Being satisfied with the reasons...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 22.12.2023 is assailed on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. By asserting that the petitioner was unable to contest the tax demand on merits because the consultant engaged by the petitioner had not informed the petitioner about these proceedings, the present writ petition was filed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had opted for the composition scheme and filed returns in Form GSTR 4 on quarterly bas...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER In these writ petitions, the petitioner has challenged the impugned orders passed for the assessment years 2018-19 to 2021-22 as detailed below: S.No. Writ Petition Date Assessment Year 1 W.P.(MD) No.12452 of 2024 21.02.2024 2018-19 2 W.P.(...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 09.11.2023 is challenged on the ground that such order travelled beyond the scope of the show cause notice. In relation to financial year 2017-2018, proceedings were initiated against the petitioner by issuing show cause notice dated 20.10.2023. The petitioner replied thereto on 28.10.2023 and 06.11.2023. The impugned order was issued in the said facts and circumstances. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner referred to the show cause notice and pointe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 22.03.2024 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. By asserting that the petitioner's business was discontinued and that the show cause notice and impugned order were uploaded on the GST portal but not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode, the present writ petition was filed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the tax proposal pertained to a mismatch between the pe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 04.09.2023 and an appellate order dated 12.04.2024 are assailed in this writ petition on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. By stating that the petitioner entrusted GST compliances to an Accountant and that such Accountant did not inform the petitioner about proceedings, the present writ petition was filed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner did not ca...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER In all these writ petitions, orders in original and the subsequent rectification orders are assailed on the ground that the petitioner was not provided a personal hearing. 2. The petitioner is engaged in the business of executing civil work contracts. Pursuant to an inspection of the petitioner's premises, show cause notice dated 07.07.2023 was issued to the petitioner. Such show cause notice was replied to on 07.08.2023 and 28.08.2023. Orders in original were issued ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER In these two writ petitions, assessment orders pertaining to distinct assessment periods are assailed on the ground that such orders were issued to a dead person. The petitioner is one of the sons of the late Mr.Munusamy Nagabushanam. By further submitting that the petitioner's father died on 08.05.2021, whereas the show cause notice and assessment orders are subsequent thereto, the present writ petitions were filed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner invited my at...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Raja Basu Chowdhury, J : 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order of cancellation of registration of the petitioner dated 27th March, 2023, passed under the Central/West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”). 3. The petitioner is registered under the provisions of the said Act. The petitioner claims to be a small...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J : 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is retained with the records. 2. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order dated 27th December 2023 passed by the appellate authority under Section 107 of the WBGST / CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”). 3. The petitioner is the proprietor of Arpan Enterprise and is registered under the provisions of the said Act. The petitioner cl...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)