Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

MANAS BANERJEE vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Jun 19, 2024)

JUDGMENT RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J : 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is retained with the records. 2. Being aggrieved with the continuance of the order of attachment effected vide Form GST DRC – 13 in terms of the provisions contained in Section 79 (1) (c) of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”) dated 8th August, 2023, the instant writ petition has been filed. 3. Ms. Basu, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER: 1. All these Criminal Petitions are filed, under Section 438 of Cr. P.C., seeking anticipatory bail by different accused, i.e. Crl. P. No. 1448 of 2024 (filed by A.4 & A.5); Crl. P. No. 1449 of 2024 (filed by A.2 & A.3); Crl. P. No. 1489 of 2024 and Crl. P. No. 1539 of 2024 are filed by the Petitioners who are not arrayed as accused in same crime viz. Crime No. 63 of 2024 of Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, they are being taken up together for disposal through ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO The petitioner prays for writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in cancelling the registration of the petitioner under CGST/APGST Act, 2017 as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and vitiated on account of violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent in Form GST REG-19, dated 15....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

A.R. STEELS vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ST AND OTHERS


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | Jun 19, 2024)

ORDER PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO The petitioner prays for writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in cancelling the registration of the petitioner under CGST/APGST Act, 2017 as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and vitiated on account of violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent in Form GST REG-19, dated 15....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M.R. METALS vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ST AND OTHERS


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | Jun 19, 2024)

ORDER PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO) The petitioner prays for writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in cancelling the registration of the petitioner under CGST/APGST Act, 2017 as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and vitiated on account of violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent in Form GST REG-19, dated 15...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J: 1. The present writ petition has been filled in relation to the order passed by the appellate authority wherein Spunbonded Polypropylene Bed Sheets have been classified under the heading 5603 instead of 6304 thereby partially denying the refund of accumulated Input Tax Credit on account of inverted duty structure of Rs. 39,61,030/- for such classification. 2. The facts in a nutshell are that the petitioner is a company duly incorporated under the provisions of t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER (HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL) Sri T.S. Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. B. Swapna Reddy, Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC, representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, Deputy Solicitor General of India. 2. Heard on admission. 3. This Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution takes exception to the order dated 12.09.2023 (annexure P-1) vide Order-in-Original No. 208/2023-24-S.Tax issued by the first respondent. This assessment order is ca...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 17.04.2024 is challenged in the Writ Petition on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. By asserting that the petitioner was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned order because GST compliances were entrusted to an auditor, who failed to notice the show cause notice and order on the GST portal, the present Writ Petition was filed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks another opportunity to contest the tax demand on me...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 31.12.2023 is assailed on the ground that sufficient opportunity was not provided to the petitioner to contest the tax proposal on merits. Proceedings were initiated against the petitioner by issuing show cause notice dated 30.09.2023. By such show cause notice, the petitioner was called upon to show cause as to why tax liability should not be imposed in respect of the mismatch between the petitioner’s GSTR 3B return and the auto populated GSTR 2A. T...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An assessment order dated 30.01.2024 is assailed on the ground that the documents submitted by the petitioner were not taken into consideration and on the ground that the tax proposal was confirmed on a ground that was not raised in the show cause notice. 2. By asserting that the show cause notice and impugned order dated 30.01.2024 were not served on the petitioner by e-mail or post, the present writ petition was filed. 3. Pursuant to the notice dated 01.03.2022 in Form ASM...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)