Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the show cause notice dated 09.03.2021 (hereafter the impugned SCN) and the order dated 28.12.2021 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the respondent pursuant to the impugned SCN, whereby the petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled retrospectively from 02.07.2017. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner also impugns certain orders issued by the Department of Trade and Taxes...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order dated 17.10.2023 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the total demand on merits. The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned order because the show cause notice and other communications were uploaded on the GST portal in the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab and not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode. 2. Learned counsel for the petit...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 29.12.2023 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner's reply was not taken into consideration. The petitioner asserts that he ceased to carry on business during financial year 2017-2018 and therefore filed a nil return in Form GSTR 1. Upon receipt of show cause notice dated 23.09.2023 alleging that the petitioner had made purchases of the value of Rs. 81,54,282/-, by reply dated 24.10.2023, the petitioner stated that no purchases were made in finan...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT KRISHNA RAO, J.: 1. This is an application filed by the Government of West Bengal and West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as “WBIDC”) under Section 36 (2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying for unconditional stay of operation of the Arbitral Award dated 18th September, 2023, passed by the Arbitral Tribunal. 2. On 11th September, 2014, a Share Purchase Agreement was entered between the Government o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following. Delay condoned. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Special Leave Petition with liberty to file a statutory appeal before the Appellate Authority within a period of one month from today. His submission is placed on record. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a statutory appeal before the Appellate Authority within a peri...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BALAJI SHIPPING vs. UNION OF INDIA KISHANGARH & OTHERS


(Rajasthan High Court | Jul 11, 2024)

Order AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (ORAL):- 1. These two petitions are being disposed of by this common order as the facts and issues involved are similar. For convenience, the facts are being taken from D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9071/2024. 2. This petition is filed aggrieved of order dated 21.02.2024 dismissing the appeal of the petitioner as time barred. 3. The brief facts are that a demand against the petitioner was created vide order dated 24.08.2023. As per the petitioner, the ap...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order dated 28.12.2023 is challenged in this writ petition on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. The petitioner asserts that the show cause notice and other communications were uploaded in the “view additional notices and orders” tab in the GST portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode. On account of not being aware of proceedings, it is stated that the petitioner could not participate in the same. 2. Learned counsel ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 15.09.2023 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. The petitioner received show cause notice dated 13.02.2023 with regard to the mismatch between the petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and the auto-populated GSTR 2A. The petitioner replied there to on 24.03.2023. Upon consideration of the petitioner's reply, it is stated that the proceedings were...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent. 2. The petitioner, is a senior citizen and a dealer, registered under the provisions of the GST Act, 2017, is before this Court challenging the impugned assessment order dated 26.12.2023 for the assessment year 2017-18 bearing reference in Case ID No. GSTIN/33AUNPG1106E1Z9/2017-18. 3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner failed to notice the notices that preced...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 25.03.2024 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. The petitioner asserts that the show cause notice and other communications were uploaded on the GST portal but not communicated to the petitioner by physical service or any other mode. On account of not being aware of the proceedings, it is stated that the petitioner could not participate in the sa...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)