Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

P. C. 1. Mentioned. Not on board. With the consent of the parties taken on board for ad-interim reliefs. 2. The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner, submitted that by an order passed today in Interim Application (L) No. 8387 of 2025, this Court has allowed the amendments to the Writ Petition, under which, (i) Notification No. 56/2023-Central Tax dated 28th December, 2023 issued by Respondent No. 3; and (ii) Notification No. 56 of 2023 dated 16th January, 2024 issued by Respo...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. 1. This batch of writ petitions seeks to assail the Orders-In-Original [OIO] dated 30.12.2022 [in W.P.(C) 6235/2023] and 02.03.2023 [in W.P.(C) 6376/2023 & W.P.(C) 6648/2023] (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned OsIO”) passed by the Respondents, whereby, inter alia, the Petitioners’ goods were confiscated under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as “the Ru...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DODLA DAIRY LIMITED vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | Mar 19, 2025)

ORDER The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner is a registered dealer, under the GST Act, dealing with milk and milk products. The assessment of the petitioner, for the period 2017-18, was completed and an assessment order has been passed by the 2nd respondent, on 09.03.2021. The petitioner was aggrieved by two components of the assessment order. The Assessing Officer had held that the falvoured milk sold by the petition...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LUPIN LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Mar 19, 2025)

ORDER 1. Impugned in this petition, filed by the petitioner by invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is an Office Memorandum bearing F. No. 15/1/2020-GSTSS dated 26.07.2021 issued by Respondent No. 1 (Annexure-I) as also an Office Memorandum bearing F. No. 116/19/2020-CX-3 dated 05.08.2021 issued by Respondent No. 3 (Annexure-II). 2. The office memorandum(s) are challenged by the petitioner primarily on the ground that the same have been issued in violation of the judgmen...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PUNCHOK WANGTAK vs. COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES DEPARTMENT & OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Mar 19, 2025)

ORDER 1. By way of instant petition, the petitioner-firm has sought the following main reliefs: i) A direction to the respondent Nos. 1&2 to the effect that inadvertent error in furnishing details in GST return needs to be recognized and permitted to be corrected by the department as it will turn no loss of government revenue and to allow rectification/correction of the GSTR-1 form either manually or through online portal. ii) Further direction to respondent Nos. 1&2 with ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The Court made the following order : ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Heard Sri Peddibhotla Venkata Sai Rajesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax, appearing for the respondents. 2. The petitioner was served with an assessment order in A. O. ZH371120OD84298 dated 27.10.2020 for the assessment period September, 2017 to June, 2018 and A.O.No. ZH370121OD41932 dated 31.12.2020 for the tax period S...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SATYAM TRADERS vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Mar 19, 2025)

ORDER 1. Heard Sri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned penalty order (MOV-09) dated March 6, 2025 under Section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') read with Section 20 of the Inte...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER These Writ petitions have been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned assessment orders in DRC-07 dated 29.01.2025, for the assessment years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 issued under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred as 'The Act'). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is engaged in the business of real estate activities and is a registered assessee under the Act. The b...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER CM APPL. 16128/2025 (Ex.) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application shall stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 3432/2025 3. The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by the order dated 31 December 2024 in terms of which its prayer for refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit [“ITC”] amounting to INR 11,45,56,735/- for the Financial Year [“FY”] 2022-23 and first quarter of FY 2023- 24 has come to be rejected. 4. We note tha...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The Court made the following order : ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner is registered under the GST Act. 2. The 2nd respondent, who is the Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Zonal Unit, Visakhapatnam, had issued summons, under Section 70 of the GST Act, seeking information and details from the petitioner. Pursuant to this notice, the deponent to the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, is said...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)