Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Mr. Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents. 2. By means of present petition, the petitioner is praying, inter alia, for the following reliefs:- "(I) Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 31.5.2023 passed by the respondent no. 1 in Appeal No. AD091122016531M/2022, Year 2022-23 under the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER Since the issue involved and the relief sought in all these Writ Petitions are identical in nature, the same were heard together and are disposed of vide this common order. 2. Challenging the impugned orders dated 13.09.2023 passed by the respondent, the petitioner has filed these Writ Petitions. 3. Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate (Tax), takes notice on behalf of the respondent. 4. By consent of the parties, the main Writ Petitions are taken up f...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is retained with the record. 2. Originally, when the instant writ petition was filed the petitioners complained that the appellate authority, without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, had disposed of the appeal. Subsequently, on 13th August 2024 Mr. Ray, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners had submitted that though the petitioners had been served with a notice via email communication prior to disposal of ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGEMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) Heard Mr. RB Phookan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Ms. K Phukan, the learned CGC appears on behalf of the Union of India. None appears on behalf of the GST on call. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the show-cause notice dated 22.10.2021 as well as the Order-In-Original dated 18.06.2024. It is relevant to take note of that the petitioner was issued a demand cum show cause notice dated 22.1...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CHOLAYIL PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE STATE OF AP AND OTHERS


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | Aug 21, 2024)

ORDER PER The petitioner is a manufacturer of medicinal soaps which are sold in India and outside India. The petitioner states that it was entitled to refund of certain unutilized CENVAT credit and two applications for such purposes were made in the year 2016 and 2017. The petitioner had made an application for refund of an amount of Rs. 64,88,803/- and another application for refund of an amount of Rs. 48,44,124. Both these applications were disposed of by the Assistant Commissioner, Cen...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. Challenging the order passed under Section 74 of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to the “said Act”) for the tax period May, 2018 to October, 2018 dated 31st May, 2023 an appeal was filed under Section 107 of the said Act. At the time of hearing of the appeal, though the appellant did not appear, the appellate authority rejected the appeal by holding that there is no ground to interfere...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order, dated 13.06.2023 only insofar as the levy of penalty under Section 73 of SGST and CGST is concerned. 2. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the entire tax along with interest has already been paid. It is submitted that the difference in the tax is only in view of the alleged difference between the value of supply reported in GSTR 3B and GSTR 1 and that penalty at 100% invokin...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “a) Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order or direction quashing the impugned Show Cause Notice No. DCCT/AUDIT/GST/73/2022-23 T.No.490 dated 04.02.2023 issued by Respondent No. 3 at Annexure-A proposing to demand and recover total IGST amounting to Rs. 4,12,17,787/- along with interest and penalty for the period July 2017 to March 2018; b) Hold that the levy of GST o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition was briefly heard on 25.07.2024 and the following order was passed. “W.P.(C) 4273/2024 4. The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under: “(a) to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or directions, quashing the orders dated 20.11.2023 passed by the learned Commissioner, Central Tax, Delhi West [Respondent No. 1] whereby he provisionally attached the current Ban...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Mr. Majumdar, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that although a determination had been made by the State respondents under Section 73 of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 for the tax period February, 2018 to March, 2018, prior to filing of the writ petition a major part of the tax liability to the extent of Rs.1,73,174/- had already been recovered from the petitioner’s electronic credit ledger. He would submit that as on today only a sum of Rs.61,07...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)