Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER 1. Mr. Sahoo, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client had challenged the adjudication order dated 19th October, 2023 in this Court. The writ petition was disposed of on order dated 19th February, 2024. Immediately thereafter on 22nd February, 2024 his client filed the appeal. It was rejected as barred by limitation. The appellate authority acted in excess of jurisdiction inasmuch as his client was entitled to exclusion of time taken in prosecu...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Mr. Ashwarya Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Mohit Maulekhi, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Petitioner is a taxable person registered under Uttarakhand GST Act. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief:- (i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, to quash the impugned demand order along with its summary in e-form DRC-07 vide reference no. ZD05...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MONONIT DAS vs. STATE TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK


(Orissa High Court | Aug 23, 2024)

ORDER 1. Miss. Tripathy, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, under challenge is show cause notice dated 5th July, 2023 followed by order dated 5th August, 2023 cancelling his client’s registration under Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. He submits, his client is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid for the return form of his client to be accepted by the department. He relies on order date...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J: 1. Leave is granted to the writ petitioner to correct the prayer portion in WPA 13616 of 2024. 2. The present review petition has been filed by the State respondents. Mr. Siddique, learned Additional Government Pleader submits that as and by way of an abundant caution an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 has been filed, inter alia, praying for condonation of delay. Since the stamp reporter’s report does not indicate there is any dela...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned advocate Ms. Vaibhavi Parikh for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Raj Tanna for the respondents. 2. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs. “(a) quash and set aside the Impugned Show Cause Notice in Form GST REG-17 dated 30/05/2024 at ANNEXURE - "A" issued by the Respondent No. 3; ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER Since the issue involved and the relief sought in both these Writ Petitions are identical in nature, the same were heard together and are disposed of vide this common order. 2. Challenging the impugned order dated 19.07.2021 and the impugned recovery notice dated 05.05.2023 passed by the respondent for the assessment year 2017-2018, the petitioner has filed these Writ Petitions. 3. Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate (Tax), takes notice on behal...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 14.03.2024 (hereafter the impugned order) passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the CGST Act) pursuant to the show cause notice dated 09.12.2023 (hereafter the impugned SCN). 2. The impugned SCN was uploaded on the portal in the category of ‘View Additional Notices & Orders’, which the petitioner claims was not easily accessible. It ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO Heard Smt. Jyothi Ratna Anumolu, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Sri T.C.D. Sekhar, learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes. 2. In all these writ petitions, the petitioners, being aggrieved by the orders of the assessing authorities, had filed appeals, before the appellate authorities, under section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act. However, these appeals have been filed beyond the period o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Shri Vaibhav Singh holding brief of Mr. Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Arvind Kumar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the State - respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 26.12.2023 passed by the respondent no. 1 in Appeal No. 204 of 2021, under Section 130 read with Section 122 of UP GST Act. 3. With the consent of the learned counse...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SABITA SINGH vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Patna High Court | Aug 22, 2024)

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking multifarious reliefs. 2. The petitioner essentially is desirous of availing statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order before the Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "Tribunal") under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "B.G.S.T. Act"). 3. However, ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)