Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of present petition, the petitioners are, inter alia, praying for the following relief:- "i. Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to qauash the order dated 25.6.2024 and 19.1.2023 passed by reespondent no. 2 (Annexure 1 and 2 to this writ petition)." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners are doing the business of ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER Since the issue involved and the relief sought in both the Writ Petitions are identical in nature, the same were heard together and disposed of vide this common order. 2. Challenging the impugned orders dated 29.04.2024 & 03.09.2024 respectively passed by the first and second respondents, the petitioner had filed these Writ Petitions. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is engaged in the business of providing house-keeping, secu...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

K.T. SAIDALAVI vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER & OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | Sep 23, 2024)

JUDGMENT These writ petitions have been filed by various entities which are admittedly associated with each other in business and essentially belonging to the same group of individuals. While W.P (C) Nos.18127/2020 and 18081/2020 are filed by Private Limited Companies. W.P (C) Nos. 18692/2020, 18695/2020 and 18122/2020 are filed by partnership firms and W.P (C) No.18078/2020 filed by one K.T. Saidalavi, Managing Director/Managing Partner of the aforesaid entities. 2. The issue that ar...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 27.12.2023 and the consequential rectification order dated 12.03.2024 passed by the 1st Respondent. 2. Mr.G.Nanmaran, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the Respondents 1 to 3. 3. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 4. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner was issued ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HONDA MOTORCYCLE AND OTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Sep 23, 2024)

ORDER SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. The short point involved in this Writ Petition is that the petitioner had preferred an Appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short “the CGST Act”) which has not been entertained by the respondents on the ground of non-payment of pre-deposit envisaged under Section 107 of the CGST Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner deposited the entire amount demanded, ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This Writ Petition is filed challenging the show cause notice dated 25.07.2024 along with summary notice in Form GST DRC-01, dated 05.08.2024 under section 74 of the CGST Act. The impugned show cause-notice demands differential amounts stated in the tabular column therein stating that the petitioner was engaged in misclassification of two-wheeler seats under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 9401 instead of CTH 8714 and the same resulted in alleged short payment of GST @ 18% instead of G...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 20.12.2023 passed by the respondent for the financial year 2017-2018. 2. Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes), takes notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 4. Alleging that the petitioner had wrongly availed the Input Tax Credit (ITC) for the financial ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) [1] Heard learned advocate Mr. Vijay H. Patel for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Deepak N. Khanchandani for the respondent No. 2. [2] By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Appellate Authority, whereby the order of cancellation of registration passed by the Assessing Officer has been upheld and the appeal was dismissed on the ground of limitation. [3] The petitioner challenged ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Per : Justice Vivek Rusia With the consent of parties, heard finally. The petitioner has filed the present under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to reimburse the extra GST amount paid @ 6% from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 along with interest. 02. The petitioner is a Company / Proprietorship Firm engaged in the construction work. The petitioner has been awarded several works vide agre...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned orders dated 29.12.2023 along with the consequential GST DRC-13 dated 19.06.2024 notice for attachment of Bank Account passed by the first respondent for the assessment year 2017-2018. 2. Mr.C.Harsha Raj, learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes), takes notice on behalf of the first respondent. 3. By consent of the parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the time of admission stage itself. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)