Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,061 Results

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents no. 5 and 6 as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents no. 1 to 4. The petitioner is a partnership firm and had applied for registration under GST on 27.6.2017, but mistakenly provided the PAN number of one of the partner of the firm. When the mistake was realized, the petitioner then again applied for registration on 14.8.2017 for registration. This time giving the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1.0. Rule. Shri Dhaval Nanavati, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent no.1 and Shri Mahavir Gadhvi, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent no.2. In the facts and circumstance of the case and with the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, present petition is taken up for final hearing today. 2.0. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed f...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PON PURE CHEMICAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Oct 30, 2017)

The application for advance ruling of M/s. Pon Pure Chemical India Pvt. Ltd. was heard on 17.10.2017 on the issue as to whether the application is fit for admission or not. Shri Shivrajan Kalyanaraman was requested on that day to submit the reasons / provisions on following issues by 23/25.10.2017. (i) Whether the authority is within jurisdiction to admit application especially on the issue of ‘place of supply’? (ii) Whether the issue is related to Customs or is related to...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner is aggrieved with the detention of goods at Exhibit P4. The goods are granite purchased by the petitioner from Tamil Nadu and transported to Karamana at Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner submits that the transport is effected for the purpose of building a residential house; the permit of which is produced at Exhibit P1 and the plan at Exhibit P2. The detention, as is seen from Exhibit P4, was for the reason that the notice issued is that of the Value Added Tax period and also ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
A consignment of M.S scrap, that was being transported at the instance of the petitioner, was detained by the respondents. Ext.P3 is the detention notice issued to the petitioner. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the insistence of the respondent that the petitioner must pay the security deposit demanded in the detention notice as a condition for release of the goods and vehicle. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Gover...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
A consignment of motor vehicle chasis that was being stock transferred at the instance of the petitioner was detained by the respondent. Ext.P3 is the detention notice issued to the petitioner. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the insistence of the respondent that the petitioner must pay the security deposit demanded in the detention notice as a condition for release of the goods and the vehicle. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Exts.P4 and P6 detention notices that have been issued detaining a consignment of goods that was being transported at the instance of the petitioner. On a perusal of Exts.P4 and P6 notices, it is seen that, out of four consignments, three consignments were detained, on the ground that, the goods which were stated to be transported pursuant to an interstate sale were not accompanied by valid documents as prescribed under the State Goods and...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Sri Rahul Agarwal assisted by Sri Varad Nath and Miss. Archi Agarwal learned counsels for the petitioner. Sri V.K.S. Raghuvanshi, appeared for the respondent no.4, Sri C.B. Tripathi for the respondent nos.1 and 5 and Sri Arvind Kumar Kushwaha holding the brief of Sri Prem Shankar Prasad, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 6. With the consent of the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respective parties, the present writ petition is disposed of finally wi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Mr.S.Doraisamy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice for respondents 1 to 4. With the consent on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner is an association registered under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 bearing Registration No.242/2010. The Association was formed for the Welfare of the members of the Road Contractors, who have bee...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Mr. Harpreet Singh, the learned Senior Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 and 4, has produced before the Court, Notification No. 37/2017-Central Tax, dated 4th October 2017, issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, whereby the grievance of the Petitioner in the present petition no longer survives. 2. In that view of the matter, the present petition is disposed of along with the pending application. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


7
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o Apr 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).