Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,471 Results

Short Summary:
The court, exercising writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, held that the petitioner’s appeal against the cancellation of its GST registration, though barred by limitatio..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court set aside the order canceling the petitioner's GST registration on the ground that the principal place of business was not found during a field visit, which was applied retrospectively. It w..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court found that the cancellation of the appellant's registration was based on a defective show cause notice lacking specific reasons, violating the principles of natural justice. The original and..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court quashed an ex parte GST assessment order that disallowed input tax credit (ITC) claimed by a wholesaler dealing solely in kerosene oil under the Public Distribution System (PDS). The petitio..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order that exempted tax, penalty, and fine on certain goods found during a business survey. It was held that proceedings under Section 130 of the G..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PSB TRADERS (M/S. PAARAGIRI BALARAMAN NAGARAJESWAR..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | May 9, 2025)

1. Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-Section (1) of Section 100 of CGST Act 2017/TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. 2. In terms of Section 103 (1) of the Act, Advance Ruling pronounced by the Authority under Chapter XVII of the Act shall be binding only- (a) On the applicant who had sought it in respect of any m....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RARE SS PROPERTIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | May 9, 2025)

1. Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai as under Sub-Section (1) of Section 100 of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. 2. In terms of Section 103 (1) of the Act, Advance Ruling pronounced by the Authority under Chapter XVII of the Act shall be binding only- (a) on the applicant who had sought it in respect of any matter ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DHARMARAJU RAGUL


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | May 9, 2025)

1. Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai as under Sub-Section (1) of Section 100 of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. 2. In terms of Section 103 (1) of the Act, Advance Ruling pronounced by the Authority under Chapter XVII of the Act shall be binding only- (a) on the applicant who had sought it in respect of any matter ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court dismissed petitions challenging the validity of Rule 36(4) of the GST Rules, which restricts Input Tax Credit (ITC) if the supplier fails to upload invoice details as required under Section ..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Short Summary:
The court set aside the impugned GST assessment order dated 29.04.2024 as it was passed without affording the petitioner an effective opportunity for personal hearing, deeming it illegal and unsustain..... Subscribe to Read more
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
9
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o May 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o May 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o May 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o May 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o May 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o May 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o May 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o May 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 Jun

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for May 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 Jun

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o May 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).