Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORAL JUDGMENT   (PER MS SONAK J) :- 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The rule is made returnable immediately at the request and with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. 3. The Petitioner, by instituting this Petition, has sought for following substantive reliefs:- “(a) this Hon’ble Court be pleased to declare that exclusion (iii) to Explanation to section 17 of the CGST Act is ultra vires to the provisions of the CGST Act ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

YFC PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Oct 21, 2024)

1. Heard Mr. Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of present petition, the petitioner is, inter alia, praying for the following relief:- “i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 31.3.2023 (Annexure No. 1) passed by respondent no. 2; 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against the o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 06.03.2024 passed by the respondent, cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner. 2. Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate (Taxes), takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the time of admission stage itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Petitioner Firm was primarily catering to the wo...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner challenging the orders of the 1st Respondent dated 18.04.2024 and to quash the same and consequently restrain the 1st and 2nd Respondents from proceedings with the recovery pursuant to the above Impugned order under Form GST DRC-07 bearing Ref. No.ZD33042414956E dated 18.04.2024 and consequentially restrain the 1st and 3rd Respondents from proceeding with recovery pursuant to the above Impugned order under Form GST DRC-07 bearing R...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER These writ petitions have been filed challenging the four impugned orders dated 19.12.2023 and the impugned recovery notices dated 14.06.2024 and the impugned bank attachment notice dated 27.05.2024. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in these cases, initially, the petitioner had filed their reply and also participated in the personal hearing before the respondent. Thereafter, the four assessment orders dated 19.12.2023 came to be passed by the re...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER Since the issue involved and the relief sought in all these Writ Petitions are identical in nature, the same were heard together and disposed of vide this common order. 2. Challenging the impugned orders dated 30.12.2023, 13.02.2024 & 09.08.2024, the petitioners have filed these Writ Petitions. 3. The issue involved in these writ petitions pertains to whether the Co-insurance premium and Reinsurance commission would be treated as supply or would be liable to pay t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Sanket Gupta appearing for learned advocate Mr. Anand Nainawati for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Hirak Shah appearing for learned advocate Mr. Nikunt Raval for the respondents. 2. Having regard to the brief controversy involved, with the consent of learned advocates for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing. 3. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PC WORLD vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER & OTHERS


(Madras High Court | Oct 18, 2024)

ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the respondent dated 31.12.2023 on the premise that the same is made in violation of principles of natural justice. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a registered dealer of computer, its parts, software and accessories, under the GST Act. The petitioner filed its return and paid appropriate taxes regularly. While so, there was surprise inspection by the I...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 20.01.2024 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed without hearing. 3. A perusal of the said order indicates that the appeal was dismissed as the document which were required to be filed were not filed and the appellant was not even present before the appellate authority. 4. The...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. The issue in this writ petition is that both the State GST Authorities and Central GST Authorities are proceeding against the petitioner with regard to the same assessment years. 3. Counsel on behalf of petitioner submits that the respondent no.3 being State GST has already completed assessment under Section 74 for the Financial Year 2017-2018. He further submits that ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)