Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

MANEESH SINGH vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Apr 11, 2018)

Heard Shri D.P. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Anil Kumar appearing for the petitioner and Shri Abhinav Ojha, learned counsel for the respondents. It is contended that in view of Section 173 of the U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, clause (b) of sub-Section (2) of Section 172 and Sections 192 and 193 of the U.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1959 are omitted and, thus, the respondent-Municipal Corporation, is vested with no power to levy advertisement tax and it is only G...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LOYALTY SOLUTIONS AND RESEARCH PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana | Apr 11, 2018)

The applicant namely M/s Loyalty Solutions and Research Pvt. Ltd. (LSRPL). owns and operates a reward point based loyalty programme that is integrated towards it partners and their customers. Under this programme, LSRPL is providing certain services to its clients/partner, such as M/s Nice Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. (NICE). The applicant is managing the customer loyalty programme for its clients/partners such as NICE, which is based on issuance of reward points, also known as payback points by the a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ESPRIT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana | Apr 11, 2018)

1. The applicant namely M/s. Esprit India is a subsidiary of M/s. Esprit De Corp. (Far East) Limited, Hong Kong (EDCFE) which in turn is a fellow subsidiary of M/s. Esprit Europe Service GmbH, Germany (‘Esprit Germany'). EDCFE is a limited company incorporated in Hong Kong, acts as sourcing service provider for Esprit Germany, EDCFE assists Esprit Germany in sourcing (on a worldwide basis)) of goods which includes wearing apparel, shoe & accessories and fabric. 2. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AOV AGRO FOOD PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana | Apr 11, 2018)

M/s. AOV Agro Food Pvt. Ltd. (‘AOV') is engaged in slaughtering and processing of poultry/sheep/goat meat and supplies products export and domestic market and Army against tender. M/s. AOV supplies to Army Sheep/goat meat in carcasses of different weight and size in frozen Slate and similarly whole chicken of different weight and size is also supplied in frozen State. The packing and dispatch pattern for both mutton and chicken is claimed to be as under:- (i) Mutton Each...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against the seizure order passed by the respondent no. 3 dated 30.03.2018 and the notice dated 30.03.2018 issued under Section 191(3) of the UPGST Act, 2017. The petitioner is having its registered office in Chandigarh and branch office at Gorakhpur in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner company ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ACTION CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana | Apr 10, 2018)

The applicant has submitted that they are manufacturer of Cranes, Backhoe Loaders, forklifts. Motor Graders, Compactors, Tower Cranes, Tractors, Harvesters, etc. The applicant raised the question of correct classification of one of their product namely Truck Mounted Cranes (TMC). The applicant submitted that they buy readymade trucks, say, Ashok Leyland, TATA, etc., and on these trucks they manufacture cranes which are mounted/fixed on these trucks. These cranes have lifting capacity of 20 to...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Shri Aloke Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Anant Kumar Tiwari for respondent no. 1 and Shri C. B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 4. The goods were being booked and transported from Panvel Raigarh, Maharashtra to M/s. Bosch Ltd. Local Distribution Centre Khasra No. 1482 NH 56 B Jaiti Kheda, Lucknow, which is a registered dealer. The goods proceeded on 24. 03. 2018 to be delivered at Lucknow and in between, the same was intercepted/detained...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ALKA INDUSTRIES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Apr 9, 2018)

The applicant M/s. Alka Industries manufactures CI Casting for which it purchases pig iron, scrap, molasses, coal, foundry minerals, sand etc. The applicant melts pig iron and scrap in the cupola furnace fired by coal and add foundry minerals in the same. The melted pig iron is poured into moulding boxes of sand and required shape of cast article is obtained. The applicant manufactures the goods according to the requirement of customers. The cast articles so manufactured are used in various i...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

INOX INDIA PVT. LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Apr 9, 2018)

The applicant M/s. Inox India Pvt. Ltd. has submitted that the range of products manufactured and supplied by the company inter alia includes Cryo Container, also known as Liquid Nitrogen Containers (subject product), which is essentially a container with double walls made of aluminum and the mechanism of this container is such that the space between two walls is vacuum and super insulated. The applicant submitted that vacuum and super insulation helps maintain temperature around minus 196 de...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AKANSHA HAIR & SKIN CARE HERBAL UNIT PVT LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Apr 9, 2018)

1. The Applicant manufactures skin care preparations and wants an Advance Ruling on the Classification of 33 of its products. The Applicant declares that the question raised in this Application is not pending or decided in any proceedings under the CGST / WBGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter the GST Act). The officer concerned has not objected to the admission of the application. As such, the question raised is admissible for Advance Ruling under section 97 (2) (a) of the GST Act. The Application is,...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)