Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,972 Results

MADHYA PRADESH POORV KSHETRA VIDYUT VITARAN COMPAN..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Sep 18, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and MP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to CGST Act and MPSGT Act respectively) by M/S Madhya Pradesh Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Company Limited (hereinafter also referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods & ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ITALIAN EDIBLES PRIVATE LIMITED (IEPL)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Sep 18, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS 1. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE: 1.1. M/S. Italian Edibles Pvt. Ltd. Indore [hereinafter referred to as the Applicant] is engaged in the manufacture, supply and export of confectionary and dairy/ sweet product. The applicant manufactures various product including flavoured wafers, Milk chocolates, Milk compound chocolates and other dairy / sweet products. The applicant is having a GST registration with GSTIN 23AACC12746N1ZG. 1.2. Further, the applicant is als...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SMVD POLYPACK PVT. LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Sep 18, 2018)

1. The Applicant stated to be, inter alia, a manufacturer of Polypropylene Leno Bags (or mesh bags) seeks a Ruling on Classification of the above goods under the CGST/WBGST Acts, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “the GST Act”). Advance Ruling is admissible under Section 97(2)(a) of the GST Act. The Applicant submits that the question raised in the Application has neither been decided by nor is pending before any authority under any provisions of the GST Act. T...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Sep 18, 2018)

1. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, stated to be in the activity of refining crude petroleum oil into, inter alia, High Speed Diesel (HSD), Motor Spirit (petrol), and Aviation Turbine Fuel (ATF), no tax on supply of which is leviable date under the CGST/WBGST Acts, 2017, (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the GST Act”) is seeking a ruling on whether or not GST paid on the railway freight for transportation of the above goods from the its Haldia Refinery to the its export warehou...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUKHBIR ROHILLA ALONG WITH 108 OTHER APPLICANTS vs. PYRAMID INFRATECH PVT. LTD


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Sep 18, 2018)

1. The brief facts of the this case are that Under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, 36 applications were filed before the Haryana State Screening Committee alleging that the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) had not been passed on to the Applicants in respect of the construction service supplied by the Respondent. The Applicants are:- S.No. S/Sh. Email ID 1 ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This writ petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the fourth respondent to forward the representation of the petitioner dated 30.07.2018 to the second respondent and to direct the second respondent to release the sum of ₹ 11,65,976/-, which the petitioner is entitled to, within a stipulated time frame. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties and perused the documents placed on record. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that they are ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of the respondent dated 19.07.2018, rejecting the petitioner's refund claim. 2.The petitioner assessee sought refund of integrated tax to the tune of ₹ 75,67,642/- based on certain reasons and grounds raised in the application for refund, one submitted through online on 14.06.2018 and another submitted in person on 19.06.2018. A deficiency memo dated 04.07.2018 was issued to the petitioner by pointing out certain deficiencies with a furt...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ASIAN PAINTS LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Sep 17, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Asian Paints Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following ISSUE. Whether following two categor...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LINDSTORM SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Sep 15, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Lindstrom Services India Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following que...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BEHR-HELLA THERMOCONTROL INDIA PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Sep 15, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST”] by Behr-Hella Thermocontrol India Pvt. Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. Whether...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


1
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o Apr 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).