Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

GROUP M MEDIA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Oct 24, 2024)

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner assails the show cause notice issued to him under section 74 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 (for short ‘the Act’) read with section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017. 2. Learned senior counsel submits that earlier the respondents had issued notice under section 73 of the Act to the petitioner, and after the reply was filed, the proceedings were dropped by the respondents vide order dated 28.02.2023. With the s...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT :-   (PER M. S. SONAK, J.) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The Rule is made returnable immediately at the request of and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 3. The Petition challenges the Order-in-Appeal No. SK/234/Appeals-II/ME/2024-25 by which the Petitioners’s appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was dismissed on the ground that the authorised signatory of the Petitioner did not sign the same. The Commissi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

R.K. TANNERS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Oct 24, 2024)

ORDER 1. This petition is directed against the order dated 18.06.2024 passed by the respondent no. 3/Deputy Commissioner, SIB-D, Commercial Tax/State GST, Kanpur under Section 130 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ('the Act') imposing a penalty of Rs. 12,75,021.54 towards the SGST and CGST each and a fine of Rs. 12,75,021.54 towards SGST and CGST each in lieu of confiscation of goods found during search conducted at the premises of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Petitioner is defending a commercial suit. 2. When the case was at the stage of defendant’s evidence, the defendant wanted to examine one official from concerned GST Office in order to show that no input tax credit with respect to the invoices in question was ever passed on to him. 3. DW-2 Mr. Sushant Mann, Senior Assistant from the concerned Department, appeared before the learned Trial Court who, in his deposition, claimed that the details with respect t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RADHEY TRADERS vs. STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Oct 24, 2024)

ORDER 1. The petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved of the order dated 20.10.2021 passed by the respondent no. 2 for the financial year 2018-19 for the tax period June, 2018 seeking to question the validity of the said order. 2. A perusal of the record indicates that earlier the petitioner had filed Writ Tax No. 394 of 2024, which came to be decided on 5.4.2024 wherein, following order was passed : "1. Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

J.H.V. STEELS LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Oct 24, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Rejoinder affidavit filed on behalf of respondent nos. 3,4 and 5 in the Court today is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State - respondents and Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the Union of India. 3. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 18.07.2019 passed by the respondent no. 5 under section 130 read...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
PC.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The rule is made returnable immediately at the request of and with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. 3. This petition challenges the refund rejection orders uploaded to the department’s website on 25 April 2024. 4. The Petitioner applied for a refund via applications dated 25 April 2024. On 3 April 2024, the Petitioner was given a show-cause notice to show cause why these refund applications shoul...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TORRENT POWER LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER


(Gujarat High Court | Oct 23, 2024)

COMMON ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE Mr.  JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. Saurabh Soparkar with learned advocate Mr. Uchit N. Sheth for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Siddharth H. Dave for the respondents. 2. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr. Siddharth Dave waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 3. Special Civil Application No.1659 of 2024 is filed with the following prayers: “...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
PER COURT: Leave granted to amend the name of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is challenging the adjudication order passed under Section 73 (9) of the M.G.S.T. Act, 2017, the C.G.S.T. Act, 2017 read with Section 20 of the I.G.S.T. Act, 2017 and the allied enactments. 3. In the light of availability of statutory remedy under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (C.G.S.T. Act), it would be appropriate for the petitioner to resort to it being a statutory remedy w...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P C : The present petition has been filed highlighting the inaction of the municipal authorities in YSR Kadapa District who had granted permission to respondent No.6 to occupy the Annie Besant Municipal High School ground for a period of 45 days for holding the Dussehra and Navaratri exhibition in not recovering the amount due as per the agreed terms. 2. It is stated that the rights were granted in favour of respondent No.6 for an amount of Rs. 2,06,50,000/- which also included the GS...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)