Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,115 Results

M/S. DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, LOGGING DIVISION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Dec 28, 2018)

(under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods And Service Tax Act, 2017 and under sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed U/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and Andhra Pradesh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s. Divisional Forest Officer, Logging Division, Chintur (hereinafter referred to as applicant), ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Pursuant to the last order dated 24.12.2018, the respondent has presented before the Court counter-affidavit dated 28.12.2018, explaining its stand in relation to the allegations on the basis of which bail granted to the petitioner was cancelled by the Sessions Court by order dated 22.12.2018. The counter affidavit is taken on record. 2. I have heard counsel for both parties at length. 3. The principal contentions advanced on behalf of the petitioner are as follows: (i) that after...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUPERNOVA ENGINEERS LTD.


(First Appellate Authority, Ahmedabad | Dec 27, 2018)

This order arises on account of appeals filed by M/s. Supernova Engineers Ltd., Survey Number 1470/1, Village Rajpur, Taluka - Kadi, Dst. Mehsana (hereinafter referred to as the ‘the appellants’ for sake of brevity) against the following two Orders-in-Original (hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned orders’ for the sake of brevity) passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Kadi Division, Gandhinagar (hereinafter referred to as the ‘adjudicating authority&rsqu...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRADHA POLYMATS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Dec 27, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. SHRADHA POLYMATS, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. Wheth...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DIRECTOR GENERAL ANTI-PROFITEERING vs. RAJ & COMPANY


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Dec 27, 2018)

1. This report dated 08.08.2018, has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that on the receipt of a reference dated 27.02.2018, where a complaint was filed with the Secretary National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA), alleging that certain major manufacturers of Fast Moving Goods Consumer Goods (FMCGs) including M/s. Garnier Laboratories Ltd....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KERALA STATE SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEER.. vs. ASIAN PAINTS LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Dec 27, 2018)

1. The present Report dated 28.09.2018, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering, vide the minutes of it's meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering b...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

STATE LEVEL SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEERI.. vs. AHUJA RADIOS


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Dec 27, 2018)

1. The present Report dated 28.09.2018, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering vide the minutes of it's meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present report dated 28.09.2018, has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering vide the minutes of it’s meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KERALA STATE LEVEL SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PRO.. vs. JANSON


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Dec 27, 2018)

1. The present report dated 28.09.2018, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering vide the minutes of it's meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Mr. Prakash Shah learned advocate with Mr. Dhaval Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner invited the attention of the Court to sub-section (3) of Section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, to submit that the clause (ii) thereof provides that where the credit has accumulated on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on output supplies (other than nil rated or fully exempt supplies), except supplies of goods or services or both as may be notified ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


12
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).